PLaying, Outwitting, and Generative AI in the Academic Business Education

The trend of generative artificial intelligence (AI) displacing middle-class workers almost without affecting the lowest- and highest-paid jobs raises new questions for business higher education. How should future managers, entrepreneurs, and business professionals be trained to become winners and not losers? What is the place of artificial intelligence in the academic examinations? Here we share our experience with a kind of a game of outwitting that students and professors play against each other, because some students are tempted to compensate with generative AI their insufficient preparation for an exam. The main result is a significant deterioration in their grades when a test requires mastery of the learning material and is purposefully designed to mislead ChatGPT. We suggest, in contrast, to stimulate the students’ expert intuition as it remains unattainable for AI. One successfully used tool here is the BBC's “Just a Minute” game. The participants compete by giving speeches avoiding hesitation, repetition, and deviation from the topic. We believe the future will need human creative skills as they remain beyond the reach of AI, and exactly that is what the university should support and foster.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogika-Pedagogy
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2024-9s.02
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PLaying, Outwitting, and Generative AI in the Academic Business Education

George Mengov, I.L. Zinovieva
Pedagogika-Pedagogy
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

PLaying, Outwitting, and Generative AI in the Academic Business Education

George Mengov, I.L. Zinovieva
article en

Abstract

The trend of generative artificial intelligence (AI) displacing middle-class workers almost without affecting the lowest- and highest-paid jobs raises new questions for business higher education. How should future managers, entrepreneurs, and business professionals be trained to become winners and not losers? What is the place of artificial intelligence in the academic examinations? Here we share our experience with a kind of a game of outwitting that students and professors play against each other, because some students are tempted to compensate with generative AI their insufficient preparation for an exam. The main result is a significant deterioration in their grades when a test requires mastery of the learning material and is purposefully designed to mislead ChatGPT. We suggest, in contrast, to stimulate the students’ expert intuition as it remains unattainable for AI. One successfully used tool here is the BBC's “Just a Minute” game. The participants compete by giving speeches avoiding hesitation, repetition, and deviation from the topic. We believe the future will need human creative skills as they remain beyond the reach of AI, and exactly that is what the university should support and foster.

Pedagogika-PedagogyVol. 96(9s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PLaying, Outwitting, and Generative AI in the Academic Business Education — George Mengov, I.L. Zinovieva · Pedagogika-Pedagogy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS