External finance and the growth of rural and urban SMEs in England

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) make a substantial contribution to regional development and economic prosperity. Access to external finance is an important determinant of business growth, and the growth potential of rural firms may be hindered by limited access to external finance. Using data from the UK Longitudinal Small Business Survey, the paper examines the impact of external finance on SME growth, paying attention to differences between rural and urban enterprises. Results from an extended ordered probit model incorporating year- and firm-effects, indicate that the impact of external finance on growth is stronger for rural businesses than their urban counterparts. This holds for both microbusinesses and SMEs. A lack of perceived direct competitors positively moderates the impact of external finance on business growth, with more rural businesses operating in competition voids. The results are robust after controlling for firms’ characteristics and endogeneity bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business Management
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2024.2436985
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External finance and the growth of rural and urban SMEs in England

Jeremy Phillipson, Matthew Gorton, Amr Khafagy, Thao Nguyen
1 citations
Journal of Small Business Management
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
0.73
article

External finance and the growth of rural and urban SMEs in England

Jeremy Phillipson, Matthew Gorton, Amr Khafagy, Thao Nguyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) make a substantial contribution to regional development and economic prosperity. Access to external finance is an important determinant of business growth, and the growth potential of rural firms may be hindered by limited access to external finance. Using data from the UK Longitudinal Small Business Survey, the paper examines the impact of external finance on SME growth, paying attention to differences between rural and urban enterprises. Results from an extended ordered probit model incorporating year- and firm-effects, indicate that the impact of external finance on growth is stronger for rural businesses than their urban counterparts. This holds for both microbusinesses and SMEs. A lack of perceived direct competitors positively moderates the impact of external finance on business growth, with more rural businesses operating in competition voids. The results are robust after controlling for firms’ characteristics and endogeneity bias.

Journal of Small Business ManagementVol. 63(5)
London Metropolitan University (GB), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

External finance and the growth of rural and urban SMEs in England — Jeremy Phillipson, Matthew Gorton, et al. · Journal of Small Business Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS