Failed Spinal Anesthesia: Incidence and Associated Factors

Introduction Spinal anesthesia, a commonly used technique for lower abdominal, pelvic, and lower extremity surgeries, involves injecting a local anesthetic into the subarachnoid space to temporarily block sensory, motor, and sympathetic nerves. Despite its high success rate, the failure of spinal anesthesia, which can lead to adverse patient outcomes, remains a concern. The failure rate varies widely, from 1% to 17%, influenced by factors such as technical challenges, patient anatomy, and practitioner experience. This study aims to determine the incidence and causes of spinal anesthesia failure in a university hospital setting. Methodology This cross-sectional, prospective observational study was conducted at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune. Data were collected from patients aged ≥18 years who underwent spinal anesthesia over one year. The study recorded various parameters, including patient demographics, surgical details, and anesthetic techniques. Failed spinal anesthesia was categorized into total failure (no block achieved) and partial failure (need for additional analgesia). Statistical analysis was performed to identify the incidence and contributing factors to spinal anesthesia failure. Results Out of 3933 patients receiving spinal anesthesia, 72 experienced failure, resulting in an incidence rate of 1.83%. The majority of failures were total (87.5%), with partial failures accounting for 12.5%. Among the cases of failed spinal anesthesia, failures were most common in obstetric surgeries (37.5%), followed by orthopedic (25%), general (22.22%), and urologic (15.28%) surgeries. The highest failure rate according to surgery type in all patients receiving spinal anesthesia was seen in orthopedic surgery (3.46%) followed by urologic surgery (2.17%). Elective surgeries had a lower failure rate (1.39%) compared to emergency surgeries (3.87%). Quincke-type needles were predominantly used, and spinal anesthesia was most often administered at the L3-L4 intervertebral space in the sitting position. Notably, first-year residents had the highest failure rate (43.06%), while more experienced practitioners had lower failure rates. Conclusion The incidence of spinal anesthesia failure in our study was 1.83%, with total failures being more common than partial failures. Factors such as surgical type, emergency status, and practitioner experience can impact the failure rate. The higher failure rate among less experienced practitioners underscores the need for improved training and expertise. Regular monitoring and refinement of spinal anesthesia techniques are essential to enhance patient safety and optimize anesthetic care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76078
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failed Spinal Anesthesia: Incidence and Associated Factors

Runjhun Jain, Shweta Khatri, Aparna Bagle
2 citations
Cureus
Anesthesia and Pain Management
1.15
article

Failed Spinal Anesthesia: Incidence and Associated Factors

Runjhun Jain, Shweta Khatri, Aparna Bagle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Spinal anesthesia, a commonly used technique for lower abdominal, pelvic, and lower extremity surgeries, involves injecting a local anesthetic into the subarachnoid space to temporarily block sensory, motor, and sympathetic nerves. Despite its high success rate, the failure of spinal anesthesia, which can lead to adverse patient outcomes, remains a concern. The failure rate varies widely, from 1% to 17%, influenced by factors such as technical challenges, patient anatomy, and practitioner experience. This study aims to determine the incidence and causes of spinal anesthesia failure in a university hospital setting. Methodology This cross-sectional, prospective observational study was conducted at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune. Data were collected from patients aged ≥18 years who underwent spinal anesthesia over one year. The study recorded various parameters, including patient demographics, surgical details, and anesthetic techniques. Failed spinal anesthesia was categorized into total failure (no block achieved) and partial failure (need for additional analgesia). Statistical analysis was performed to identify the incidence and contributing factors to spinal anesthesia failure. Results Out of 3933 patients receiving spinal anesthesia, 72 experienced failure, resulting in an incidence rate of 1.83%. The majority of failures were total (87.5%), with partial failures accounting for 12.5%. Among the cases of failed spinal anesthesia, failures were most common in obstetric surgeries (37.5%), followed by orthopedic (25%), general (22.22%), and urologic (15.28%) surgeries. The highest failure rate according to surgery type in all patients receiving spinal anesthesia was seen in orthopedic surgery (3.46%) followed by urologic surgery (2.17%). Elective surgeries had a lower failure rate (1.39%) compared to emergency surgeries (3.87%). Quincke-type needles were predominantly used, and spinal anesthesia was most often administered at the L3-L4 intervertebral space in the sitting position. Notably, first-year residents had the highest failure rate (43.06%), while more experienced practitioners had lower failure rates. Conclusion The incidence of spinal anesthesia failure in our study was 1.83%, with total failures being more common than partial failures. Factors such as surgical type, emergency status, and practitioner experience can impact the failure rate. The higher failure rate among less experienced practitioners underscores the need for improved training and expertise. Regular monitoring and refinement of spinal anesthesia techniques are essential to enhance patient safety and optimize anesthetic care.

CureusVol. 16(12)
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.