Scaffolding informed consent

The principle of respecting patient autonomy underpins the concept and practice of informed consent. Yet current approaches to consent often ignore the ways in which the exercise of autonomy is deeply epistemically dependent.In this paper, we draw on philosophical descriptions of autonomy 'scaffolding' and apply them to informed consent in medicine. We examine how this relates to other models of the doctor-patient relationship and other theories (eg, the notion of relational autonomy). A focus on scaffolding autonomy reframes the justification for existing ways of supporting decisions. In other cases, it suggests a need to rethink how, when and where professionals obtain consent. It may highlight the benefit of technology for supporting decisions.Finally, we consider the implications for some high-stakes decisions where autonomy is thought to be critical, for example, termination of pregnancy. We argue that such decisions should not be free from all sources of influence-rather they should be protected from undesired influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110105
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding informed consent

Neil Levy, Dominic Wilkinson
9 citations
Journal of Medical Ethics
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
7.64
article

Scaffolding informed consent

Neil Levy, Dominic Wilkinson
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The principle of respecting patient autonomy underpins the concept and practice of informed consent. Yet current approaches to consent often ignore the ways in which the exercise of autonomy is deeply epistemically dependent.In this paper, we draw on philosophical descriptions of autonomy 'scaffolding' and apply them to informed consent in medicine. We examine how this relates to other models of the doctor-patient relationship and other theories (eg, the notion of relational autonomy). A focus on scaffolding autonomy reframes the justification for existing ways of supporting decisions. In other cases, it suggests a need to rethink how, when and where professionals obtain consent. It may highlight the benefit of technology for supporting decisions.Finally, we consider the implications for some high-stakes decisions where autonomy is thought to be critical, for example, termination of pregnancy. We argue that such decisions should not be free from all sources of influence-rather they should be protected from undesired influence.

Journal of Medical Ethics
National University of Singapore (SG), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Wellcome Trust, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
7.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.