A systematic model- and experimental approach to hydro-mechanical and thermo-mechanical fracture processes in crystalline rocks

The paper presents the key findings of Task G SAFENET of the DECOVALEX 2023 project “Safety Assessment of Fluid Flow, Shear, Thermal and Reaction Processes within Crystalline Rock Fracture NETworks”. It utilizes a systematic and experimental approach to numerically simulate mechanical (M), hydro-mechanical (HM), and thermo-mechanical (TM) fracture processes in brittle rocks. The Task team introduced, applied, and compared a wide range of numerical methods, including both continuum and discontinuum methods, for simulating related fracture processes. Task G is based on three key experiments: the Freiberg, GREAT cell, and KICT experiments, which analyze M, HM, and TM processes respectively. Classic HM and THM benchmark exercises serve as a common basis by using analytical solutions for a plane line discontinuity in a poro-elastic medium (Sneddon and Lowengrub, 1969) and a point heat source in a thermo-poro-elastic medium (Booker and Savvidou, 1985), (Chaudhry et al., 2019). These solutions also serve as a reference for rough fractures and simple fracture networks. A systematic set of new benchmark cases has been derived based on the GREAT cell experiments. An analysis of the constant normal load (CNL) experiment has been conducted using micro- and macroscopic approaches, based on the Freiberg experiment. The GREAT cell experiments provided a database for evaluating the mechanical and hydro-mechanical responses of various rock samples (resin, greywacke, gneis) in triaxial tests with a rotational stress field. Fracture permeability was determined as a function of normal stresses in the rotational stress field. The KICT experiments were used to investigate thermally induced shear slip and dilation processes. The SAFENET Task contributed to the Open Science concept in DECOVALEX by providing a freely accessible Jupyter notebooks for selected benchmark exercises. • Systematic and experimental-based approach to numerical simulation of fracture processes • Large variety of numerical methods, continuum and discontinuum methods compared • Benchmark suite based on Freiberg, GREAT and KICT laboratory experiments • Experiments covering mechanically, hydraulically and thermally induced fracturing • Open Science contribution: Initiation of a DECOVALEX Jupyter Lab (Appendix C).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2024.100616
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic model- and experimental approach to hydro-mechanical and thermo-mechanical fracture processes in crystalline rocks

Jens Birkhölzer, Andrew Fraser‐Harris, T. SASAKI, Saeha Kwon et al.
7 citations
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.88
article

A systematic model- and experimental approach to hydro-mechanical and thermo-mechanical fracture processes in crystalline rocks

Jens Birkhölzer, Andrew Fraser‐Harris, T. SASAKI, Saeha Kwon, Mengsu Hu, Christopher J. McDermott, A. W. Bond, Peng‐Zhi Pan, Jeoung Seok Yoon, Keita Yoshioka, Hejuan Liu, Olaf Kolditz, Thomas Nagel, Mostafa Mollaali, Łi Zhuang, Wenqing Wang, Chan–Hee Park, Kwang‐Il Kim, Jung–Wook Park, Changsoo Lee, Gonçalo Benitez Cunha, Teklu Hadgu, J. Rutqvist, Son Nguyen, Yifeng Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The paper presents the key findings of Task G SAFENET of the DECOVALEX 2023 project “Safety Assessment of Fluid Flow, Shear, Thermal and Reaction Processes within Crystalline Rock Fracture NETworks”. It utilizes a systematic and experimental approach to numerically simulate mechanical (M), hydro-mechanical (HM), and thermo-mechanical (TM) fracture processes in brittle rocks. The Task team introduced, applied, and compared a wide range of numerical methods, including both continuum and discontinuum methods, for simulating related fracture processes. Task G is based on three key experiments: the Freiberg, GREAT cell, and KICT experiments, which analyze M, HM, and TM processes respectively. Classic HM and THM benchmark exercises serve as a common basis by using analytical solutions for a plane line discontinuity in a poro-elastic medium (Sneddon and Lowengrub, 1969) and a point heat source in a thermo-poro-elastic medium (Booker and Savvidou, 1985), (Chaudhry et al., 2019). These solutions also serve as a reference for rough fractures and simple fracture networks. A systematic set of new benchmark cases has been derived based on the GREAT cell experiments. An analysis of the constant normal load (CNL) experiment has been conducted using micro- and macroscopic approaches, based on the Freiberg experiment. The GREAT cell experiments provided a database for evaluating the mechanical and hydro-mechanical responses of various rock samples (resin, greywacke, gneis) in triaxial tests with a rotational stress field. Fracture permeability was determined as a function of normal stresses in the rotational stress field. The KICT experiments were used to investigate thermally induced shear slip and dilation processes. The SAFENET Task contributed to the Open Science concept in DECOVALEX by providing a freely accessible Jupyter notebooks for selected benchmark exercises. • Systematic and experimental-based approach to numerical simulation of fracture processes • Large variety of numerical methods, continuum and discontinuum methods compared • Benchmark suite based on Freiberg, GREAT and KICT laboratory experiments • Experiments covering mechanically, hydraulically and thermally induced fracturing • Open Science contribution: Initiation of a DECOVALEX Jupyter Lab (Appendix C).

Geomechanics for Energy and the EnvironmentVol. 41
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CA), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), James Hutton Institute (GB), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KR), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Quintessa (United Kingdom) (GB), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KR), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences (DE), TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.