Internal diameter determination in conical glassware: A comparative analysis of measurement methods

This study investigates internal diameter determination in conical graduated volumetric instruments by comprehensively comparing three measurement methods: vernier calliper, optical comparator, and height gauge. Unlike international standards, which offer a single internal diameter value valid for cylindrical volumetric instruments, conical glassware presents different volumes between graduations and multiple internal diameter values. The research underscores the significance of accurate internal diameter determination in minimizing meniscus reading uncertainty during gravimetric calibration. The paper references a novel optical comparator method, achieving a maximum 2 % error in the meniscus uncertainty. However, acknowledging limitations and cost concerns, it explores two alternative measurement methods: vernier calliper or height gauge. Vernier calliper is cheaper and easier, but the height gauge is effective, relatively low-cost, and especially useful when vernier calliper measurements are impossible. The study contributes valuable insights into comparing these methods for the first time, emphasizing their applicability in diverse conical glassware scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Sensors
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101554
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal diameter determination in conical glassware: A comparative analysis of measurement methods

Mirna-Guadalupe Tornero-Navarro, Omar Jair Purata Sifuentes, Griselda-Alelí Mederos-Gutiérrez, Edgar-Jacobo Valencia-Velázquez
1 links
Measurement Sensors
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
article

Internal diameter determination in conical glassware: A comparative analysis of measurement methods

Mirna-Guadalupe Tornero-Navarro, Omar Jair Purata Sifuentes, Griselda-Alelí Mederos-Gutiérrez, Edgar-Jacobo Valencia-Velázquez
article en

Abstract

This study investigates internal diameter determination in conical graduated volumetric instruments by comprehensively comparing three measurement methods: vernier calliper, optical comparator, and height gauge. Unlike international standards, which offer a single internal diameter value valid for cylindrical volumetric instruments, conical glassware presents different volumes between graduations and multiple internal diameter values. The research underscores the significance of accurate internal diameter determination in minimizing meniscus reading uncertainty during gravimetric calibration. The paper references a novel optical comparator method, achieving a maximum 2 % error in the meniscus uncertainty. However, acknowledging limitations and cost concerns, it explores two alternative measurement methods: vernier calliper or height gauge. Vernier calliper is cheaper and easier, but the height gauge is effective, relatively low-cost, and especially useful when vernier calliper measurements are impossible. The study contributes valuable insights into comparing these methods for the first time, emphasizing their applicability in diverse conical glassware scenarios.

Measurement SensorsVol. 38
Universidad de Guanajuato (MX), Universidad Internacional (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.