An opportunity lost? The declining role of authorised covert human intelligence sources in combating organised crime

Combatting organised crime, requires Agencies to deploy a range of collection capabilities to identify community threats, to accurately select and prioritise organised crime targets and to inform operational decision-making. Central to this effort is the ability to identify, recruit and deploy Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS). It is therefore paradoxical that the United Kingdom’s CHIS authorisations have been in steep decline since the enactment of the bespoke Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Scotland Act, 2000). This research seeks to critically discuss as to what are the key factors contributing to this decline. Consequently, this review suggests that the decline in CHIS authorisations are to be found in a complex configuration of factors. Two stand out as significant; i) the impact of resource reduction on CHIS operational capacity and capability, and ii) an emergence of a culture of fear and risk aversion as a constraining factor on CHIS recruitment and use. • CHIS provide valuable human intelligence across the spectrum of organised crime. • The decline in CHIS numbers means that Agencies are less effective at combatting organised crime. • Resource reduction has impacted on the capacity and capability of Dedicated Source Units to deploy CHIS. • Agency policy and practice, rather than legislative constraints, has played a greater role in the decline in CHIS authorisations. • An Agency’s culture of fear and risk aversion overstates the vulnerabilities that come with the use and management of CHIS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Criminology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An opportunity lost? The declining role of authorised covert human intelligence sources in combating organised crime

Jordan Nunan, Ian Stanier
1 citations
Journal of Economic Criminology
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
1.13
article

An opportunity lost? The declining role of authorised covert human intelligence sources in combating organised crime

Jordan Nunan, Ian Stanier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Combatting organised crime, requires Agencies to deploy a range of collection capabilities to identify community threats, to accurately select and prioritise organised crime targets and to inform operational decision-making. Central to this effort is the ability to identify, recruit and deploy Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS). It is therefore paradoxical that the United Kingdom’s CHIS authorisations have been in steep decline since the enactment of the bespoke Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Scotland Act, 2000). This research seeks to critically discuss as to what are the key factors contributing to this decline. Consequently, this review suggests that the decline in CHIS authorisations are to be found in a complex configuration of factors. Two stand out as significant; i) the impact of resource reduction on CHIS operational capacity and capability, and ii) an emergence of a culture of fear and risk aversion as a constraining factor on CHIS recruitment and use. • CHIS provide valuable human intelligence across the spectrum of organised crime. • The decline in CHIS numbers means that Agencies are less effective at combatting organised crime. • Resource reduction has impacted on the capacity and capability of Dedicated Source Units to deploy CHIS. • Agency policy and practice, rather than legislative constraints, has played a greater role in the decline in CHIS authorisations. • An Agency’s culture of fear and risk aversion overstates the vulnerabilities that come with the use and management of CHIS.

Journal of Economic CriminologyVol. 7
University of Northampton (GB), University of Buckingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.