Microbial secondary metabolites for modulating plant biotic stress resistance: Bridging the lab-field gap

• Biotic stress significantly reduces crop productivity. • Microbes have been demonstrated to enhance plant tolerance to biotic stress. • Microbial inoculants show promise in lab studies, but their efficacy remains inconsistent in the field. • Research is needed to bridge the gap between lab and field testing. • Combining microbial extracts and inoculants could enhance treatment effectiveness. Biotic stress, including pest attacks, plant diseases caused by pathogenic microbes, and competition from weeds, significantly limit the optimal crop productivity. The use of beneficial microorganisms has been shown to enhance plants' tolerance to these stressors. Numerous laboratory studies have investigated the effectiveness of microbial secondary metabolites as biological control agents against pests, diseases, and weeds. However, a critical challenge remains in determining whether microorganisms applied in the field will produce the same secondary metabolites as those observed in the laboratory, and whether their effectiveness will be comparable, better, or worse. This review examines the comparative effectiveness of microbial agents in producing secondary metabolites that enhance plant tolerance to biotic stress, considering both laboratory and field settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Stress
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100720
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbial secondary metabolites for modulating plant biotic stress resistance: Bridging the lab-field gap

Reza Fauzi Dwisandi, Mia Miranti, Febri Doni, Ani Widiastuti et al.
10 citations
Plant Stress
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
6.00
article

Microbial secondary metabolites for modulating plant biotic stress resistance: Bridging the lab-field gap

Reza Fauzi Dwisandi, Mia Miranti, Febri Doni, Ani Widiastuti, Muhamad Shakirin Mispan, Dedat Prismantoro, Ravindra Chandra Joshi, Muhammad Adil Awal
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• Biotic stress significantly reduces crop productivity. • Microbes have been demonstrated to enhance plant tolerance to biotic stress. • Microbial inoculants show promise in lab studies, but their efficacy remains inconsistent in the field. • Research is needed to bridge the gap between lab and field testing. • Combining microbial extracts and inoculants could enhance treatment effectiveness. Biotic stress, including pest attacks, plant diseases caused by pathogenic microbes, and competition from weeds, significantly limit the optimal crop productivity. The use of beneficial microorganisms has been shown to enhance plants' tolerance to these stressors. Numerous laboratory studies have investigated the effectiveness of microbial secondary metabolites as biological control agents against pests, diseases, and weeds. However, a critical challenge remains in determining whether microorganisms applied in the field will produce the same secondary metabolites as those observed in the laboratory, and whether their effectiveness will be comparable, better, or worse. This review examines the comparative effectiveness of microbial agents in producing secondary metabolites that enhance plant tolerance to biotic stress, considering both laboratory and field settings.

Plant StressVol. 15
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Philippine Rice Research Institute (PH), Cornell University (US), University of Malaya (MY), Padjadjaran University (ID)
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Universitas Padjadjaran
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
6.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.