Motion Capturing in cricket with bare minimum hardware and optimised software: A comparison of MediaPipe and OpenPose

In sports, wearable systems and optical systems are used to estimate human poses and calculate body angles using key points. Wearable systems are not suitable for use in an outdoor environment since they disturb to players. The optical methods such as MediaPipe (Google Inc.) and OpenPose (CMU) are used to capture the humans using key points. Optical approaches can be used with daylight on an outdoor background without a controlled environment. This study compares the MediaPipe and OpenPose with the HMDB51 dataset, UCF Sports Action dataset, and video footage captured by the team from a cricket player. The result of this study identified that MediaPipe is better than OpenPose in capturing humans for abstracting the key points accurately to analyze the data. MediaPipe can be suggested as the best approach to capture the human skeleton from the motion withing low performance devices like using low cost camera(s) with a CPU instead of a GPU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ssitcon62437.2024.10796169
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Video Analysis and Summarization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motion Capturing in cricket with bare minimum hardware and optimised software: A comparison of MediaPipe and OpenPose

Pathum Weerakkody, Kaveendra Maduwantha, Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage, Ashan Induranga et al.
3 citations
Video Analysis and Summarization
0.75
article

Motion Capturing in cricket with bare minimum hardware and optimised software: A comparison of MediaPipe and OpenPose

Pathum Weerakkody, Kaveendra Maduwantha, Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage, Ashan Induranga, Banage T. G. S. Kumara, Ishan Jayaweerage, Niroshan Gunawardana, Kanishka Rajamanthri, Avishka Kothalawala
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In sports, wearable systems and optical systems are used to estimate human poses and calculate body angles using key points. Wearable systems are not suitable for use in an outdoor environment since they disturb to players. The optical methods such as MediaPipe (Google Inc.) and OpenPose (CMU) are used to capture the humans using key points. Optical approaches can be used with daylight on an outdoor background without a controlled environment. This study compares the MediaPipe and OpenPose with the HMDB51 dataset, UCF Sports Action dataset, and video footage captured by the team from a cricket player. The result of this study identified that MediaPipe is better than OpenPose in capturing humans for abstracting the key points accurately to analyze the data. MediaPipe can be suggested as the best approach to capture the human skeleton from the motion withing low performance devices like using low cost camera(s) with a CPU instead of a GPU.

Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Asian Development Bank, Ministry of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Video Analysis and Summarization
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Motion Capturing in cricket with bare minimum hardware and optimised software: A comparison of MediaPipe and OpenPose — Pathum Weerakkody, Kaveendra Maduwantha, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS