Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial

Abstract Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria that has no specific cause or trigger, present on most days of the week for 6 weeks or more. The incidence of chronic urticaria in the pediatric age group is between 0.1% and 3%. Levocetirizine and bilastine are nonsedative second-generation antihistamines used to treat urticaria in both adults and children. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of levocetirizine and bilastine in cases of pediatric CSU using Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) and Urticaria Severity Score (USS). The secondary objective was to evaluate and compare the safety and quality of life (QoL) using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, observer-blinded study where 65 patients (6–16 years) with a history of urticaria >6 weeks were divided into two groups with computer-generated randomization. Thirty-two patients were included in Group A, who received levocetirizine, and 33 patients were included in Group B, who received bilastine. UAS7, USS, and DLQI were recorded at every visit. The primary outcome was measured using UAS and USS and the secondary outcome in the form of patient’s QoL was assessed using the DLQI score. Laboratory parameters were assessed at the first visit and at the end of 3 months. Results: There was a significant difference ( P = 0.002) in UAS7, USS, and DLQI between the baseline and last visit scores for each group. There was no significant difference ( P = 0.28) in the scores between the two groups. Laboratory parameters like liver enzymes and complete blood count also did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Both levocetirizine and bilastine are equally effective and safe in the treatment of CSU at the end of 3 months. However, bilastine showed a better fall in the DLQI as compared to levocetirizine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_61_24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urticaria and Related Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial

Debashree Sahoo, Maitreyee Panda, Ajaya Kumar Jena, Anil Kumar Panda
1 citations
Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology
Urticaria and Related Conditions
0.47
article

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial

Debashree Sahoo, Maitreyee Panda, Ajaya Kumar Jena, Anil Kumar Panda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria that has no specific cause or trigger, present on most days of the week for 6 weeks or more. The incidence of chronic urticaria in the pediatric age group is between 0.1% and 3%. Levocetirizine and bilastine are nonsedative second-generation antihistamines used to treat urticaria in both adults and children. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of levocetirizine and bilastine in cases of pediatric CSU using Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) and Urticaria Severity Score (USS). The secondary objective was to evaluate and compare the safety and quality of life (QoL) using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, observer-blinded study where 65 patients (6–16 years) with a history of urticaria >6 weeks were divided into two groups with computer-generated randomization. Thirty-two patients were included in Group A, who received levocetirizine, and 33 patients were included in Group B, who received bilastine. UAS7, USS, and DLQI were recorded at every visit. The primary outcome was measured using UAS and USS and the secondary outcome in the form of patient’s QoL was assessed using the DLQI score. Laboratory parameters were assessed at the first visit and at the end of 3 months. Results: There was a significant difference ( P = 0.002) in UAS7, USS, and DLQI between the baseline and last visit scores for each group. There was no significant difference ( P = 0.28) in the scores between the two groups. Laboratory parameters like liver enzymes and complete blood count also did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Both levocetirizine and bilastine are equally effective and safe in the treatment of CSU at the end of 3 months. However, bilastine showed a better fall in the DLQI as compared to levocetirizine.

Indian Journal of Paediatric DermatologyVol. 25(4)
Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Urticaria and Related Conditions
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.