Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis

ABSTRACT Two assessments derived from the applied behavior analysis (ABA) literature were conducted to understand rugby players' preferences for drills and the context in which their engagement was inconsistent. First, 32 female varsity rugby players aged 18 to 25 participated in a survey‐based preference assessment. Next, 20 of the same players participated in an on‐field response restriction (RR) preference assessment. Results from the survey‐based preference assessment and the on‐field response restriction preference assessment were consistent. Specifically, offensive and no‐to‐light contact drills were preferred over defensive and heavy contact drills. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of group‐based preference assessments and how using ABA procedures may benefit varsity sports coaching to improve athlete performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Interventions
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2073
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis

Kwadwo Britwum, Griffin W. Rooker, Elizabeth Parthum, Julie C. Crochet
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis

Kwadwo Britwum, Griffin W. Rooker, Elizabeth Parthum, Julie C. Crochet
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two assessments derived from the applied behavior analysis (ABA) literature were conducted to understand rugby players' preferences for drills and the context in which their engagement was inconsistent. First, 32 female varsity rugby players aged 18 to 25 participated in a survey‐based preference assessment. Next, 20 of the same players participated in an on‐field response restriction (RR) preference assessment. Results from the survey‐based preference assessment and the on‐field response restriction preference assessment were consistent. Specifically, offensive and no‐to‐light contact drills were preferred over defensive and heavy contact drills. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of group‐based preference assessments and how using ABA procedures may benefit varsity sports coaching to improve athlete performance.

Behavioral InterventionsVol. 40(1)
Mount St. Mary's University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.