Toward a code of conduct for technology ethics practitioners

This paper explores possibilities for creating a code of conduct for practitioners working in technology ethics. The number of technology ethics practitioners is growing when including ethicists embedded in research projects on technology, members of research ethics committees who assess the consequences of technological research, ethicists advising companies, and facilitators in moral/societal exploration through workshops, games, and brainstorm sessions. And, it is not just assessment what technology ethics practitioners do, but increasingly also the guidance of technology development through processes like responsible research and innovation, ethics by design, and design for values. Our exploratory is initial, and this paper may be seen as a position paper. It focusses on preliminary issues such as identifying the types of ethics practitioners the code can be for, the roles the code can play for these practitioners, charting controversies it should address, and the (institutional) arrangements needed for making a code effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2440958
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a code of conduct for technology ethics practitioners

Pieter E. Vermaas, Sabine Ammon, Wenzel Mehnert
3 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
article

Toward a code of conduct for technology ethics practitioners

Pieter E. Vermaas, Sabine Ammon, Wenzel Mehnert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper explores possibilities for creating a code of conduct for practitioners working in technology ethics. The number of technology ethics practitioners is growing when including ethicists embedded in research projects on technology, members of research ethics committees who assess the consequences of technological research, ethicists advising companies, and facilitators in moral/societal exploration through workshops, games, and brainstorm sessions. And, it is not just assessment what technology ethics practitioners do, but increasingly also the guidance of technology development through processes like responsible research and innovation, ethics by design, and design for values. Our exploratory is initial, and this paper may be seen as a position paper. It focusses on preliminary issues such as identifying the types of ethics practitioners the code can be for, the roles the code can play for these practitioners, charting controversies it should address, and the (institutional) arrangements needed for making a code effective.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 12(1)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.