Science Process Skills Through The Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain And Create (Radec) Learning Model On Science Materials In High School

Natural Sciences (IPA) is a science related to nature that is systematically arranged through an investigation. The RADEC model as one of the solutions in the learning process that accommodates students to exchange information obtained and solve a problem. The purpose of this study is to implement the role of RADEC syntax in triggering student expertise in science process abilities (KPS). Increasing KPS requires the application of the RADEC Model to see the significance of increasing the use of the model, the measuring instrument used to measure KPS is a data collection instrument in the form of an observation sheet that has been prepared and then validated constructively (material experts). Sampling was carried out using convenience sampling, class sampling was carried out using a non-random technique which was then tested statistically as a basis for determining classes with the same abilities. The type of research conducted in this study is Pre-Experimental Design research. The posttest score of students' science process skills in the experimental class had the highest score of 96 and the lowest score of 78. While the posttest score in the control class had the highest score of 89 and the lowest score of 72. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 86 with a high category and in the control class was 80 with a very moderate category. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 81.66% with a moderate category. Students' science process skills in the Experimental class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 93.18% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 75.00%. Students' science process skills in the Control class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 86.36% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 61.36%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.896
Primary Topic
STEM Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science Process Skills Through The Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain And Create (Radec) Learning Model On Science Materials In High School

Ayu Rahmi, Sirry Alvina, Rahmah Nursada, Maulida Aufa Rofiki Lubis et al.
Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)
STEM Education
article

Science Process Skills Through The Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain And Create (Radec) Learning Model On Science Materials In High School

Ayu Rahmi, Sirry Alvina, Rahmah Nursada, Maulida Aufa Rofiki Lubis, Syarifah Rita Zahara
article en

Abstract

Natural Sciences (IPA) is a science related to nature that is systematically arranged through an investigation. The RADEC model as one of the solutions in the learning process that accommodates students to exchange information obtained and solve a problem. The purpose of this study is to implement the role of RADEC syntax in triggering student expertise in science process abilities (KPS). Increasing KPS requires the application of the RADEC Model to see the significance of increasing the use of the model, the measuring instrument used to measure KPS is a data collection instrument in the form of an observation sheet that has been prepared and then validated constructively (material experts). Sampling was carried out using convenience sampling, class sampling was carried out using a non-random technique which was then tested statistically as a basis for determining classes with the same abilities. The type of research conducted in this study is Pre-Experimental Design research. The posttest score of students' science process skills in the experimental class had the highest score of 96 and the lowest score of 78. While the posttest score in the control class had the highest score of 89 and the lowest score of 72. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 86 with a high category and in the control class was 80 with a very moderate category. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 81.66% with a moderate category. Students' science process skills in the Experimental class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 93.18% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 75.00%. Students' science process skills in the Control class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 86.36% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 61.36%.

Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)Vol. 4
Malikussaleh University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
STEM Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.