Improving Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of Quantity Take-Off Through BIM Integration: A Case Study of the D Lecture Hall Building at Malikussaleh University

Abstract. Quantity Take-Off (QTO) calculation is a crucial step in construction planning to determine material needs with high accuracy. However, traditional methods such as manual calculations often fail to meet accuracy demands, especially in projects with complex designs. This study compares manual methods, Revit, and Clash Detection in generating QTO for the D Lecture Hall building project at Malikussaleh University. The aim of this research is to analyze the quantitative differences between methods and assess which method is the most effective. The research method involves calculating the QTO for structural and architectural elements using the three methods, followed by an analysis of the average differences in results. The findings show that the manual method has an average difference of 35.76% for structural elements and 43.14% for architectural elements when compared to Revit. The difference between manual and Clash Detection is slightly smaller, with 33.09% for structural elements and 42.41% for architectural elements. Conversely, the difference between Revit and Clash Detection is very small, only 1.51% for structural elements and 3.98% for architectural elements. While the QTO results between Revit and Clash Detection are almost identical, Clash Detection offers the additional advantage of validation, ensuring that the design is free from clashes between elements. This study concludes that Clash Detection is the most effective method in generating QTO because it not only provides accurate results but also ensures that the design is ready for implementation without technical errors. By integrating BIM technology, this research offers a more efficient and accurate approach to QTO calculation, serving as a guideline for construction project managers in handling complex designs more effectively. Keywords: Quantity Take-Off (QTO), Clash Detection, Building Information Modeling (BIM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.893
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of Quantity Take-Off Through BIM Integration: A Case Study of the D Lecture Hall Building at Malikussaleh University

David Sarana, Maizuar Maizuar, Fadhliani Fadhliani, Nura Usrina et al.
Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Improving Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of Quantity Take-Off Through BIM Integration: A Case Study of the D Lecture Hall Building at Malikussaleh University

David Sarana, Maizuar Maizuar, Fadhliani Fadhliani, Nura Usrina, Sofyan Sofyan, Gigih Prasetia
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Quantity Take-Off (QTO) calculation is a crucial step in construction planning to determine material needs with high accuracy. However, traditional methods such as manual calculations often fail to meet accuracy demands, especially in projects with complex designs. This study compares manual methods, Revit, and Clash Detection in generating QTO for the D Lecture Hall building project at Malikussaleh University. The aim of this research is to analyze the quantitative differences between methods and assess which method is the most effective. The research method involves calculating the QTO for structural and architectural elements using the three methods, followed by an analysis of the average differences in results. The findings show that the manual method has an average difference of 35.76% for structural elements and 43.14% for architectural elements when compared to Revit. The difference between manual and Clash Detection is slightly smaller, with 33.09% for structural elements and 42.41% for architectural elements. Conversely, the difference between Revit and Clash Detection is very small, only 1.51% for structural elements and 3.98% for architectural elements. While the QTO results between Revit and Clash Detection are almost identical, Clash Detection offers the additional advantage of validation, ensuring that the design is free from clashes between elements. This study concludes that Clash Detection is the most effective method in generating QTO because it not only provides accurate results but also ensures that the design is ready for implementation without technical errors. By integrating BIM technology, this research offers a more efficient and accurate approach to QTO calculation, serving as a guideline for construction project managers in handling complex designs more effectively. Keywords: Quantity Take-Off (QTO), Clash Detection, Building Information Modeling (BIM).

Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies (MICoMS)Vol. 4
Malikussaleh University (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.