Back to normalities, plural? A longitudinal disaster-management perspective on Covid-19 in higher education

Abstract This paper offers a fresh perspective on the COVID-19 situation of higher education institutions from a disaster-management perspective. Based on conceptual models of disaster management theory and with the help of a longitudinal multi-method, multi-perspective approach, this research contributes to better understanding the challenges during and “after” such a crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic started with a single event (e.g. campuses are shut down because of a dangerous disease) and transformed into a situation where new events (like new virus mutants) deepened the crisis during the hypothetical restabilisation phases. This includes the switch from a very coherent problem perception of all institutional actors in the beginning, to different and conflicting viewpoints and preferences over time. The paper argues that these developments contribute to the already fragmented realities of higher education institutions, e.g. by never giving institutions the time to agree on how to deal with the abundance of options in the long run.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tertiary Education and Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-024-09146-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Back to normalities, plural? A longitudinal disaster-management perspective on Covid-19 in higher education

Julia Spörk, Oliver Vettori, Karl Ledermüller
1 citations
Tertiary Education and Management
COVID-19 and Mental Health
0.64
article

Back to normalities, plural? A longitudinal disaster-management perspective on Covid-19 in higher education

Julia Spörk, Oliver Vettori, Karl Ledermüller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper offers a fresh perspective on the COVID-19 situation of higher education institutions from a disaster-management perspective. Based on conceptual models of disaster management theory and with the help of a longitudinal multi-method, multi-perspective approach, this research contributes to better understanding the challenges during and “after” such a crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic started with a single event (e.g. campuses are shut down because of a dangerous disease) and transformed into a situation where new events (like new virus mutants) deepened the crisis during the hypothetical restabilisation phases. This includes the switch from a very coherent problem perception of all institutional actors in the beginning, to different and conflicting viewpoints and preferences over time. The paper argues that these developments contribute to the already fragmented realities of higher education institutions, e.g. by never giving institutions the time to agree on how to deal with the abundance of options in the long run.

Tertiary Education and ManagementVol. 30(4)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Back to normalities, plural? A longitudinal disaster-management perspective on Covid-19 in higher education — Julia Spörk, Oliver Vettori, et al. · Tertiary Education and Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS