COMPARISON OF RACOG AND RACOG-RUS FOR CLASSIFYING IMBALANCED DATA ON GRADIENT BOOSTING AND NAÏVE BAYES PERFORMANCE

This study aims to determine the effect of resampling RACOG and RACOG-RUS data on Gradient Boosting and Naïve Bayes classification in predicting water quality with unbalanced data. The data used in this study were 720 data from January 2022 to December 2023. It was found that Gradient Boosting performed best when using RACOG-RUS resampling data and feature selection with a number of numIntances of 200. While Naïve Bayes has the best performance when using RACOG-RUS resampling data without feature selection with a number of numIntances of 300. It can be seen that resampling RACOG data does not outperform RACOG-RUS in both classification models because it is known that the data generated in RACOG does not make the dataset more balanced than RACOG-RUS. Hybrid sampling is necessary if RACOG samples are used as the training dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56801/jmasm.v24.i1.6
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF RACOG AND RACOG-RUS FOR CLASSIFYING IMBALANCED DATA ON GRADIENT BOOSTING AND NAÏVE BAYES PERFORMANCE

Heri Kuswanto, Dedy Dwi Prastyo, M. Y. Matdoan, Rahmi Fadhilah et al.
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

COMPARISON OF RACOG AND RACOG-RUS FOR CLASSIFYING IMBALANCED DATA ON GRADIENT BOOSTING AND NAÏVE BAYES PERFORMANCE

Heri Kuswanto, Dedy Dwi Prastyo, M. Y. Matdoan, Rahmi Fadhilah, Dinda Ayu Safira
article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of resampling RACOG and RACOG-RUS data on Gradient Boosting and Naïve Bayes classification in predicting water quality with unbalanced data. The data used in this study were 720 data from January 2022 to December 2023. It was found that Gradient Boosting performed best when using RACOG-RUS resampling data and feature selection with a number of numIntances of 200. While Naïve Bayes has the best performance when using RACOG-RUS resampling data without feature selection with a number of numIntances of 300. It can be seen that resampling RACOG data does not outperform RACOG-RUS in both classification models because it is known that the data generated in RACOG does not make the dataset more balanced than RACOG-RUS. Hybrid sampling is necessary if RACOG samples are used as the training dataset.

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical MethodsVol. 24(1)
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ID)
Ministry of Environment, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Universitas Pattimura, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.