The simulation of ELM control by the advanced divertor configuration in EAST

Abstract Edge localized modes (ELMs) are effectively suppressed in the ‘quasi-snowflake’ (QSF) divertor discharges, which has been observed in the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST). To obtain the physical mechanism of ELM suppression, the numerical simulations are carried out using the BOUT++ turbulence model. The simulations reveal that the large local magnetic shear near the outer mid-plane (OMP) induced by QSF divertor plays a key role in the ELM suppression. Using the EFIT code, a series of plasma equilibria with different 2nd X-points and nearly fixed last closed flux surfaces (LCFSs) are generated to analyze the effects of the different magnetic configurations on ELMs. Here we mainly discuss the standard single-null (SN), snowflake plus (SF+), and snowflake minus (SF-) divertors. The simulation results indicate that: (1) for linear instability, compared to SN, SF+ is more unstable, while SF- is more stable. Essentially, the local magnetic shear formed by different divertor geometries can alter the growth rate of the peeling-ballooning (P-B) mode. Through statistical analysis, there is an inverse correlation between the strength of local magnetic shear and the growth rate of P-B mode; (2) for ELM energy loss, SN is 4.60%, SF+ is 7.50%, and SF- is 0.35%. The SF+ divertor triggers a larger ELM, which is consistent with the TCV experiments; while the SF- divertor reduces the ELM amplitude, which is similar to the QSF experiments in EAST. Further analysis shows that the Reynolds stress determines the ELM size under different divertor configurations. The Reynolds stress can redistribute energy to fluctuations and cause the growth of low- n modes. What’s more, the SF- divertor not only suppresses the radial transport, but also has large magnetic flux expansion and connection length, which can reduce the target heat flux effectively. The conclusion of this paper shows that the advanced divertor configurations are promising for the future fusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada1e2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The simulation of ELM control by the advanced divertor configuration in EAST

X.X. He, H. R. Qi, Qingze Yu, Shifeng Mao et al.
3 citations
Nuclear Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
article

The simulation of ELM control by the advanced divertor configuration in EAST

X.X. He, H. R. Qi, Qingze Yu, Shifeng Mao, Pengcheng Xie, Minyou Ye, Yanlong Li, B. Gui, Tianyang Xia, Zhengping Luo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Edge localized modes (ELMs) are effectively suppressed in the ‘quasi-snowflake’ (QSF) divertor discharges, which has been observed in the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST). To obtain the physical mechanism of ELM suppression, the numerical simulations are carried out using the BOUT++ turbulence model. The simulations reveal that the large local magnetic shear near the outer mid-plane (OMP) induced by QSF divertor plays a key role in the ELM suppression. Using the EFIT code, a series of plasma equilibria with different 2nd X-points and nearly fixed last closed flux surfaces (LCFSs) are generated to analyze the effects of the different magnetic configurations on ELMs. Here we mainly discuss the standard single-null (SN), snowflake plus (SF+), and snowflake minus (SF-) divertors. The simulation results indicate that: (1) for linear instability, compared to SN, SF+ is more unstable, while SF- is more stable. Essentially, the local magnetic shear formed by different divertor geometries can alter the growth rate of the peeling-ballooning (P-B) mode. Through statistical analysis, there is an inverse correlation between the strength of local magnetic shear and the growth rate of P-B mode; (2) for ELM energy loss, SN is 4.60%, SF+ is 7.50%, and SF- is 0.35%. The SF+ divertor triggers a larger ELM, which is consistent with the TCV experiments; while the SF- divertor reduces the ELM amplitude, which is similar to the QSF experiments in EAST. Further analysis shows that the Reynolds stress determines the ELM size under different divertor configurations. The Reynolds stress can redistribute energy to fluctuations and cause the growth of low- n modes. What’s more, the SF- divertor not only suppresses the radial transport, but also has large magnetic flux expansion and connection length, which can reduce the target heat flux effectively. The conclusion of this paper shows that the advanced divertor configurations are promising for the future fusion.

Nuclear FusionVol. 65(2)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), ShanghaiTech University (CN), Institute of Plasma Physics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou Province
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.