Optimized Two-Stage Planning Model for Integrating Compressed Air Energy Storage With Uncertain Correlated Wind Farms in Power Systems

As energy demands grow, integrating renewable energy sources (RESs) and energy storage systems (ESSs) has become essential for reducing carbon emissions and reliance on conventional power plants while maintaining grid security. Among ESS technologies, Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) stands out as a promising solution but remains underexplored in grid applications. This study introduces a two-stage mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model for optimizing CAES integration with hybrid power systems. The first stage addresses planning variables, including site selection, capacity, and power ratings, minimizing total costs and voltage deviations. The second stage optimizes the operation of CAES units and conventional generators, focusing on reducing operational costs, energy losses, carbon emissions, and voltage deviations. The model employs probabilistic approaches with the five-point estimation method (5-PEM) and Clayton copulas to handle wind power variability. Optimization is achieved using MOPSO-TOPSIS and a hybrid NSGAII-MOPSO-TOPSIS, with Tabu Search Algorithm (TSA) for local refinement. The model’s effectiveness is validated on a modified IEEE-57 bus system with wind farms. Results demonstrate significant economic, environmental, and technical benefits of CAES integration. The hybrid approach (Case 3) outperforms MOPSO-TOPSIS (Case 2), achieving a 3.68% reduction in daily fuel costs and a 6.05% reduction in carbon emissions, compared to 2.92% and 4.23% in Case 2. Case 3 also shows superior reductions in power losses (5.04% vs. 4.84%) and voltage deviations (0.81% vs. 0.60%).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100838
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized Two-Stage Planning Model for Integrating Compressed Air Energy Storage With Uncertain Correlated Wind Farms in Power Systems

Hussain Shareef, Ahmad K. ALAhmad, Azzam Abu-Rayash, Renuga Verayiah et al.
7 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
article

Optimized Two-Stage Planning Model for Integrating Compressed Air Energy Storage With Uncertain Correlated Wind Farms in Power Systems

Hussain Shareef, Ahmad K. ALAhmad, Azzam Abu-Rayash, Renuga Verayiah, Saleh Ba-swaimi, Agileswari Ramasam
article en
7 citations

Abstract

As energy demands grow, integrating renewable energy sources (RESs) and energy storage systems (ESSs) has become essential for reducing carbon emissions and reliance on conventional power plants while maintaining grid security. Among ESS technologies, Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) stands out as a promising solution but remains underexplored in grid applications. This study introduces a two-stage mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model for optimizing CAES integration with hybrid power systems. The first stage addresses planning variables, including site selection, capacity, and power ratings, minimizing total costs and voltage deviations. The second stage optimizes the operation of CAES units and conventional generators, focusing on reducing operational costs, energy losses, carbon emissions, and voltage deviations. The model employs probabilistic approaches with the five-point estimation method (5-PEM) and Clayton copulas to handle wind power variability. Optimization is achieved using MOPSO-TOPSIS and a hybrid NSGAII-MOPSO-TOPSIS, with Tabu Search Algorithm (TSA) for local refinement. The model’s effectiveness is validated on a modified IEEE-57 bus system with wind farms. Results demonstrate significant economic, environmental, and technical benefits of CAES integration. The hybrid approach (Case 3) outperforms MOPSO-TOPSIS (Case 2), achieving a 3.68% reduction in daily fuel costs and a 6.05% reduction in carbon emissions, compared to 2.92% and 4.23% in Case 2. Case 3 also shows superior reductions in power losses (5.04% vs. 4.84%) and voltage deviations (0.81% vs. 0.60%).

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 25
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, Universiti Tenaga Nasional
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.