Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases

Interdisciplinary research fuels innovation. In this paper, we examine the interdisciplinarity of research output driven by funding. Considering 36 major infectious diseases, we model interdisciplinarity through temporal correlation networks based on funded and unfunded research from 1995-2022. Using hierarchical clustering, we identify coherent periods of time or regimes characterised by important research topics like vaccinations or the Zika outbreak. We establish that funded research is less interdisciplinary than unfunded research, but the effect has decreased markedly over time. In terms of network growth, we find a tendency of funded research to focus on readily established connections leading to compartmentalisation and conservatism. In contrast, unfunded research tends to be exploratory and bridge distant knowledge leading to knowledge integration. Our results show that interdisciplinary research on prominent infectious diseases like HIV and tuberculosis tends to have strong bridging effects facilitating global knowledge integration in the network. At the periphery of the network, we observe the emergence of vaccination-related and Zika-related knowledge clusters, both with limited systemic impact. We further show that despite the surge in publications related to COVID-19, its systematic impact on the disease network remains relatively low. Overall, this research provides a generalisable framework to examine the impact of funding in interdisciplinary knowledge creation. It can assist in priority setting, for example with horizon scanning for new and emerging threats to health, such as pandemic planning. Policymakers, funding agencies, and research institutions should consider revamping evaluation systems to reward interdisciplinary work and implement mechanisms that promote and support intelligent risk-taking. • We present a framework to analyse funded vs unfunded interdisciplinary research (IDR). • Funded IDR compartmentalises by reinforcing existing research clusters. • Unfunded IDR is more exploratory by linking distant knowledge. • As a result, funded IDR segregates while unfunded IDR integrates. • We explore how major events like SARS, Zika, and COVID-19 shape IDR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Informetrics
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101634
Citations
5
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases

Markus Brede, Michael Head, Anbang Du
5 citations
Journal of Informetrics
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
article

Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases

Markus Brede, Michael Head, Anbang Du
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research fuels innovation. In this paper, we examine the interdisciplinarity of research output driven by funding. Considering 36 major infectious diseases, we model interdisciplinarity through temporal correlation networks based on funded and unfunded research from 1995-2022. Using hierarchical clustering, we identify coherent periods of time or regimes characterised by important research topics like vaccinations or the Zika outbreak. We establish that funded research is less interdisciplinary than unfunded research, but the effect has decreased markedly over time. In terms of network growth, we find a tendency of funded research to focus on readily established connections leading to compartmentalisation and conservatism. In contrast, unfunded research tends to be exploratory and bridge distant knowledge leading to knowledge integration. Our results show that interdisciplinary research on prominent infectious diseases like HIV and tuberculosis tends to have strong bridging effects facilitating global knowledge integration in the network. At the periphery of the network, we observe the emergence of vaccination-related and Zika-related knowledge clusters, both with limited systemic impact. We further show that despite the surge in publications related to COVID-19, its systematic impact on the disease network remains relatively low. Overall, this research provides a generalisable framework to examine the impact of funding in interdisciplinary knowledge creation. It can assist in priority setting, for example with horizon scanning for new and emerging threats to health, such as pandemic planning. Policymakers, funding agencies, and research institutions should consider revamping evaluation systems to reward interdisciplinary work and implement mechanisms that promote and support intelligent risk-taking. • We present a framework to analyse funded vs unfunded interdisciplinary research (IDR). • Funded IDR compartmentalises by reinforcing existing research clusters. • Unfunded IDR is more exploratory by linking distant knowledge. • As a result, funded IDR segregates while unfunded IDR integrates. • We explore how major events like SARS, Zika, and COVID-19 shape IDR.

Journal of InformetricsVol. 19(1)
University of Southampton (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.