The ethics of theft: Reevaluating the impacts of floral larceny on plant reproductive success

Plants and their interaction partners offer unparalleled views of evolutionary ecology. Nectar larceny, entailing nectar extraction without pollinating, is thought to be an example of a harmful, antagonistic behavior, but the precise consequences of floral larceny on plant reproductive success remain contentious. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 153 studies across 120 plant species, using 14 moderators to assess the effects of floral larceny on plant reproductive success and examine the key moderators. We found that floral larceny negatively impacts flower traits, pollinator visitation, pollen deposition, and fruit set, while having a neutral effect on critical female fitness indicators, such as seed set and seed quality, as well as on male fitness. By altering pollinator behavior, floral larceny may reduce geitonogamy, potentially enhancing genetic diversity. Additionally, factors such as pollinator type, plant mating system, and pollen limitation were identified as key moderators of these effects. Our analysis reveals an ultimately neutral effect of floral larceny on plant reproductive success, with potential benefits in certain contexts. These findings suggest that floral larceny plays a complex and multifaceted role within plant-pollinator interactions, facilitating the evolutionary stability and coexistence of floral larcenists and host plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Diversity
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.12.004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of theft: Reevaluating the impacts of floral larceny on plant reproductive success

Yong‐Deng He, Chun‐Feng Yang, Michael C. Orr, X. Q. Li et al.
3 citations
Plant Diversity
Plant and animal studies
3.09
article

The ethics of theft: Reevaluating the impacts of floral larceny on plant reproductive success

Yong‐Deng He, Chun‐Feng Yang, Michael C. Orr, X. Q. Li, Zhong‐Ming Ye, Qingfeng Wang, Shengwei Wang, Xiao‐Fang Jin, Jin-Ru Zhong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Plants and their interaction partners offer unparalleled views of evolutionary ecology. Nectar larceny, entailing nectar extraction without pollinating, is thought to be an example of a harmful, antagonistic behavior, but the precise consequences of floral larceny on plant reproductive success remain contentious. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 153 studies across 120 plant species, using 14 moderators to assess the effects of floral larceny on plant reproductive success and examine the key moderators. We found that floral larceny negatively impacts flower traits, pollinator visitation, pollen deposition, and fruit set, while having a neutral effect on critical female fitness indicators, such as seed set and seed quality, as well as on male fitness. By altering pollinator behavior, floral larceny may reduce geitonogamy, potentially enhancing genetic diversity. Additionally, factors such as pollinator type, plant mating system, and pollen limitation were identified as key moderators of these effects. Our analysis reveals an ultimately neutral effect of floral larceny on plant reproductive success, with potential benefits in certain contexts. These findings suggest that floral larceny plays a complex and multifaceted role within plant-pollinator interactions, facilitating the evolutionary stability and coexistence of floral larcenists and host plants.

Plant DiversityVol. 47(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (DE), Wuhan University (CN), Wuhan Botanical Garden (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Zoology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.