Performance of cell free DNA as a screening tool based on the results of first trimester screening

The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the screening of fetal abnormalities has optimized prenatal care and decreased the rate of invasive diagnostic tests. In this retrospective descriptive study, we began with 1874 singleton pregnancies. After exclusion of some cases, the study cohort ended up with 1674 cases. We analyzed the performance of NIPT based on the results of first trimester screening (FTS) using serum screening combined with NT. The cases were also compared to diagnostic testing/pregnancy outcomes. Notably, in the subgroup with FTS risk < 1000, NIPT was reported to be normal in all cases with no false negative results. In the risk group of 1/300-1/1000, NIPT could detect all trisomy 21 cases with one false positive result. Moreover, in the risk group of 1/11 - 1/300, NIPT could detect all cases of trisomy 21, 13 and 18 with low false positive rate. However, the false positive rate for sex chromosomal abnormalities was high. Taken together, the current study confirms the applicability of NIPT as a tool for detection of fetal trisomies with high sensitivity and specificity. Yet, the high rate of false positive results for sex chromosome abnormalities should be considered in the interpretation of the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Cytogenetics
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-024-00702-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of cell free DNA as a screening tool based on the results of first trimester screening

Yalda Mohammadi, Mahtab Motevasselian, Soudabeh Jamali, Fariba Navidpour et al.
1 citations
Molecular Cytogenetics
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
article

Performance of cell free DNA as a screening tool based on the results of first trimester screening

Yalda Mohammadi, Mahtab Motevasselian, Soudabeh Jamali, Fariba Navidpour, Samira Chagheri, Saeed Delshad, Sheyda Khalilian, Pourandokht Saadati, Solat Eslami, Mohsen Rahmani, Mohammad‐Hossein Modarresi, Mohammad Amin Omrani, Shahram Savad, Saloomeh Amidi, Sarang Younesi, Soudeh Ghafouri‐Fard, Mohammad M. Amin, Soraya Saleh Gargari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the screening of fetal abnormalities has optimized prenatal care and decreased the rate of invasive diagnostic tests. In this retrospective descriptive study, we began with 1874 singleton pregnancies. After exclusion of some cases, the study cohort ended up with 1674 cases. We analyzed the performance of NIPT based on the results of first trimester screening (FTS) using serum screening combined with NT. The cases were also compared to diagnostic testing/pregnancy outcomes. Notably, in the subgroup with FTS risk < 1000, NIPT was reported to be normal in all cases with no false negative results. In the risk group of 1/300-1/1000, NIPT could detect all trisomy 21 cases with one false positive result. Moreover, in the risk group of 1/11 - 1/300, NIPT could detect all cases of trisomy 21, 13 and 18 with low false positive rate. However, the false positive rate for sex chromosomal abnormalities was high. Taken together, the current study confirms the applicability of NIPT as a tool for detection of fetal trisomies with high sensitivity and specificity. Yet, the high rate of false positive results for sex chromosome abnormalities should be considered in the interpretation of the results.

Molecular CytogeneticsVol. 17(1)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Alborz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.