Biochar supplementation affects the microbiome of recycled manure solids for cow bedding: A metagenomic analysis

The widespread use of recycled manure solids (RMS) as cow bedding material is not without risks, because cattle manure may act as a vehicle for pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria dissemination. Thus, our aim was to evaluate RMS supplemented with a pine biochar produced in Portugal as a new cow bedding material, because the use of biochar has been shown to have the potential to mitigate the effect of relevant bacterial species when added to animal manure microbiota. Our experimental setup consisted on fresh RMS samples that were collected on a commercial dairy farm and placed in naturally-ventilated containers for a total of 4 groups: (1) nonsupplemented RMS, (2) RMS supplemented with 2.5% (wt/wt) of biochar, (3) RMS supplemented with 5% (wt/wt) of biochar, and (4) RMS supplemented with 10% (wt/wt) of biochar. Sampling was performed at 4 different incubation times (0, 5, 15, and 30 d) and in 2 distinct seasons: April through May (humid season) and June through July (dry season). The resulting 32 samples were subjected to DNA extraction and their microbiome profile determined through complete 16S rDNA gene sequencing using Nanopore next-generation sequencing. We observed that biochar supplementation clearly altered the microbiome of RMS, which was reflected in changes in populations' diversity and the relative abundance of relevant pathogenic bacteria. In particular, we found that long-term storage (30 d) was more beneficial than short-term storage, an effect that was more evident for samples supplemented with 2.5% or 5% biochar. In both seasons, those concentrations of biochar led to a decrease in the levels of several mastitis-causing agents (Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci). In addition, we also observed a reduction in the levels of Salmonella spp. and gram-positive bacilli in the biochar-supplemented samples. Unexpectedly, however, those same conditions yielded an increase in the abundance of Brucella spp., a group that includes important infectious agents, highlighting the need for a deeper evaluation of the effect of biochar supplementation of RMS to ensure the future safe and sustainable use of this environmentally-friendly resource in animal production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25616
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar supplementation affects the microbiome of recycled manure solids for cow bedding: A metagenomic analysis

Luís M. Tavares, Joana F. Guerreiro, Marcelo Pereira, Manuela Oliveira et al.
3 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.38
article

Biochar supplementation affects the microbiome of recycled manure solids for cow bedding: A metagenomic analysis

Luís M. Tavares, Joana F. Guerreiro, Marcelo Pereira, Manuela Oliveira, David Fangueiro, Ricardo Dias, Ricardo Bexiga, Ana José Pires, Ana Rita Mendes Esteves, Mónica Nunes, Lélia Chambel, Pedro Pascoal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The widespread use of recycled manure solids (RMS) as cow bedding material is not without risks, because cattle manure may act as a vehicle for pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria dissemination. Thus, our aim was to evaluate RMS supplemented with a pine biochar produced in Portugal as a new cow bedding material, because the use of biochar has been shown to have the potential to mitigate the effect of relevant bacterial species when added to animal manure microbiota. Our experimental setup consisted on fresh RMS samples that were collected on a commercial dairy farm and placed in naturally-ventilated containers for a total of 4 groups: (1) nonsupplemented RMS, (2) RMS supplemented with 2.5% (wt/wt) of biochar, (3) RMS supplemented with 5% (wt/wt) of biochar, and (4) RMS supplemented with 10% (wt/wt) of biochar. Sampling was performed at 4 different incubation times (0, 5, 15, and 30 d) and in 2 distinct seasons: April through May (humid season) and June through July (dry season). The resulting 32 samples were subjected to DNA extraction and their microbiome profile determined through complete 16S rDNA gene sequencing using Nanopore next-generation sequencing. We observed that biochar supplementation clearly altered the microbiome of RMS, which was reflected in changes in populations' diversity and the relative abundance of relevant pathogenic bacteria. In particular, we found that long-term storage (30 d) was more beneficial than short-term storage, an effect that was more evident for samples supplemented with 2.5% or 5% biochar. In both seasons, those concentrations of biochar led to a decrease in the levels of several mastitis-causing agents (Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci). In addition, we also observed a reduction in the levels of Salmonella spp. and gram-positive bacilli in the biochar-supplemented samples. Unexpectedly, however, those same conditions yielded an increase in the abundance of Brucella spp., a group that includes important infectious agents, highlighting the need for a deeper evaluation of the effect of biochar supplementation of RMS to ensure the future safe and sustainable use of this environmentally-friendly resource in animal production.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(3)
University of Lisbon (PT), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.