Democrats Versus Democracy: The Southern Response to the Voting Rights Act

How do dominant groups respond to electoral interventions designed to help minority groups? This article posits that when democratizing interventions empowering subordinate groups are imposed upon dominant groups, dominant groups alter institutions to protect their power. I provide evidence of this in the context of the Voting Rights Act, which enfranchised millions of Black people in the South despite opposition from white elites. Using difference-in-differences design, I show that white incumbents reduced the numbers of county elected officials serving residents in parts of the South under federal supervision 1959–1965 to reduce representation for Black voters without directly blocking votes. I further show that efforts to blunt the electoral effects of Black enfranchisement were most pronounced in counties with large Black populations and large historical Democratic majorities. These findings suggest that when confronted with reforms that constrain their electoral power, dominant groups respond with de-democratizing manipulations of political institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734538
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democrats Versus Democracy: The Southern Response to the Voting Rights Act

Mayya Komisarchik
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Democrats Versus Democracy: The Southern Response to the Voting Rights Act

Mayya Komisarchik
article en

Abstract

How do dominant groups respond to electoral interventions designed to help minority groups? This article posits that when democratizing interventions empowering subordinate groups are imposed upon dominant groups, dominant groups alter institutions to protect their power. I provide evidence of this in the context of the Voting Rights Act, which enfranchised millions of Black people in the South despite opposition from white elites. Using difference-in-differences design, I show that white incumbents reduced the numbers of county elected officials serving residents in parts of the South under federal supervision 1959–1965 to reduce representation for Black voters without directly blocking votes. I further show that efforts to blunt the electoral effects of Black enfranchisement were most pronounced in counties with large Black populations and large historical Democratic majorities. These findings suggest that when confronted with reforms that constrain their electoral power, dominant groups respond with de-democratizing manipulations of political institutions.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 88(1)
University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.