Embryo selection, AI and reproductive choice

Abstract In reproductive medicine, current research into the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve embryo selection has been met with enthusiasm. Within ethics, previous assessments of AI-assisted embryo selection have focused, for example, on liability gaps or risks arising from opaque decision-making. I argue that this focus on the ethical issues raised by AI in embryo selection alone is incomplete because it neglects how AI’s convergence with other innovative reproductive technologies raises further ethical issues. I describe how AI is acting as a catalyst for a social disruption of human reproduction and for a profound change in reproductive morality. The social disruption is the result of the convergence of improved embryo culture, the optimization of embryo selection through AI and the possibility of selecting a screened embryo. This technological interplay creates a pull towards assisted reproduction, even for those prospective parents who can reproduce without medical assistance. In discussing a fictional case of prospective parents, I argue that this social disruption of reproduction is linked to a moral disruption. The moral disruption manifests itself in the deep uncertainty of prospective parents about legitimate ways of procreating. I explain how this uncertainty is rooted in a technology-induced disruption of the concept of reproductive choice. I then outline how the ethical debate about AI-assisted embryo selection should be reframed in light of this moral disruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00651-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embryo selection, AI and reproductive choice

Aurélie Halsband
2 citations
AI and Ethics
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
3.42
article

Embryo selection, AI and reproductive choice

Aurélie Halsband
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In reproductive medicine, current research into the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve embryo selection has been met with enthusiasm. Within ethics, previous assessments of AI-assisted embryo selection have focused, for example, on liability gaps or risks arising from opaque decision-making. I argue that this focus on the ethical issues raised by AI in embryo selection alone is incomplete because it neglects how AI’s convergence with other innovative reproductive technologies raises further ethical issues. I describe how AI is acting as a catalyst for a social disruption of human reproduction and for a profound change in reproductive morality. The social disruption is the result of the convergence of improved embryo culture, the optimization of embryo selection through AI and the possibility of selecting a screened embryo. This technological interplay creates a pull towards assisted reproduction, even for those prospective parents who can reproduce without medical assistance. In discussing a fictional case of prospective parents, I argue that this social disruption of reproduction is linked to a moral disruption. The moral disruption manifests itself in the deep uncertainty of prospective parents about legitimate ways of procreating. I explain how this uncertainty is rooted in a technology-induced disruption of the concept of reproductive choice. I then outline how the ethical debate about AI-assisted embryo selection should be reframed in light of this moral disruption.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
University of Bonn (DE)
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.