Balancing conflicting goals in ungulate management and forestry in the light of climate change in hemiboreal and boreal forests: insights from Europe and Northern America

Forests produce a vast diversity of ecosystem services. To safeguard management goals such as timber production, forest management needs to consider risks for damage caused by different agents, such as ungulates. The selective foraging behaviour of ungulates can limit forest regeneration, generating conflicts with forestry objectives and challenging both forest and ungulate management. In hemiboreal and boreal forests, both timber production and ungulate numbers have increased considerably during the past 50 years. Climate change will affect forestry and ungulates, possibly generating novel ungulate–forest interactions (e.g., changed forest systems, new herbivore assemblages). To support a framework for future management of ungulate–forest systems in hemiboreal and boreal forests in Europe and North America in the light of climate change, we provide an overview of the literature on current management strategies that seek to balance the conflict between timber production and maintaining ungulate densities at a level that satisfies various stakeholder groups. Derived from current literature, we suggest that future mitigations enhancing forest resilience and simultaneously reducing browsing damage should include the following overarching strategies: (1) Both ungulate and forest management require a large-scale and context-specific planning to ensure a suitable forage landscape for ungulates diluting browsing pressure on economic valuable trees. This might be particularly needed in places where much of the forest is privately owned. (2) Anthropogenic ungulate–forest systems require continuous regulation of ungulate numbers (i.e., by predation, hunting, or a combination of both) to enable “windows of opportunities” for forest regeneration and to counteract positive feedback loops of forage-enriching activities for ungulates by forestry. (3) Given increasing system complexity, adaptive ecosystem-based management plans for ungulates should consider multispecies approaches to match management with other interests in multifunctional forest landscapes. Given the large diversity across northern temperate and boreal ungulate–forest systems (e.g., centralized versus de-centralized management, access to land, game meat trade, ecological and social complexity), there are differences in preconditions across the Northern hemisphere to balance timber production and ungulate densities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Reviews
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0068
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing conflicting goals in ungulate management and forestry in the light of climate change in hemiboreal and boreal forests: insights from Europe and Northern America

Joakim Hjältén, Anouschka R. Hof, Miguel Montoro Girona, Wiebke Neumann et al.
3 citations
Environmental Reviews
Forest Management and Policy
0.85
article

Balancing conflicting goals in ungulate management and forestry in the light of climate change in hemiboreal and boreal forests: insights from Europe and Northern America

Joakim Hjältén, Anouschka R. Hof, Miguel Montoro Girona, Wiebke Neumann, Nathan R. De Jager
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Forests produce a vast diversity of ecosystem services. To safeguard management goals such as timber production, forest management needs to consider risks for damage caused by different agents, such as ungulates. The selective foraging behaviour of ungulates can limit forest regeneration, generating conflicts with forestry objectives and challenging both forest and ungulate management. In hemiboreal and boreal forests, both timber production and ungulate numbers have increased considerably during the past 50 years. Climate change will affect forestry and ungulates, possibly generating novel ungulate–forest interactions (e.g., changed forest systems, new herbivore assemblages). To support a framework for future management of ungulate–forest systems in hemiboreal and boreal forests in Europe and North America in the light of climate change, we provide an overview of the literature on current management strategies that seek to balance the conflict between timber production and maintaining ungulate densities at a level that satisfies various stakeholder groups. Derived from current literature, we suggest that future mitigations enhancing forest resilience and simultaneously reducing browsing damage should include the following overarching strategies: (1) Both ungulate and forest management require a large-scale and context-specific planning to ensure a suitable forage landscape for ungulates diluting browsing pressure on economic valuable trees. This might be particularly needed in places where much of the forest is privately owned. (2) Anthropogenic ungulate–forest systems require continuous regulation of ungulate numbers (i.e., by predation, hunting, or a combination of both) to enable “windows of opportunities” for forest regeneration and to counteract positive feedback loops of forage-enriching activities for ungulates by forestry. (3) Given increasing system complexity, adaptive ecosystem-based management plans for ungulates should consider multispecies approaches to match management with other interests in multifunctional forest landscapes. Given the large diversity across northern temperate and boreal ungulate–forest systems (e.g., centralized versus de-centralized management, access to land, game meat trade, ecological and social complexity), there are differences in preconditions across the Northern hemisphere to balance timber production and ungulate densities.

Environmental ReviewsVol. 33
United States Geological Survey (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Forest Management and Policy
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.