Exploring Resources and Reasoning Practices in Socioscientific System Modeling for Justice-Centered Science Education

Integrating science education with social justice is vital for preparing students to critically address significant societal issues like climate change and pandemics. This study examines the effectiveness of socioscientific system modeling as a tool within Justice-Centered Science Pedagogy (JCSP) to enhance middle school students' understanding of social justice science issues. It focuses on how system modeling can scaffold students' reasoning about complex social systems, informed by their lived experiences, cultural backgrounds, and social identities. Our research involved 27 middle school students using system models to explore the societal and scientific dimensions of the COVID-19 pandemic. By leveraging the experiences and insights of students, educators can create transformative learning environments that not only recognize but also utilize students' unique knowledge bases as legitimate contributions to classroom discourse. The implications for instructional design highlight the need for multifaceted, responsive activities that align with the principles of JCSP and empower students as agents of societal transformation. The research contributes to the ongoing discourse on enhancing science education through justice-centered approaches that address the complexities of socioscientific context and the cultural relevance of scientific knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-01-0017
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Resources and Reasoning Practices in Socioscientific System Modeling for Justice-Centered Science Education

Rebecca R. Lesnefsky, Jasmyne Yeldell, Troy D. Sadler, Jamie Elsner et al.
5 citations
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
10.48
article

Exploring Resources and Reasoning Practices in Socioscientific System Modeling for Justice-Centered Science Education

Rebecca R. Lesnefsky, Jasmyne Yeldell, Troy D. Sadler, Jamie Elsner, Li Ke, Eric A. Kirk
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Integrating science education with social justice is vital for preparing students to critically address significant societal issues like climate change and pandemics. This study examines the effectiveness of socioscientific system modeling as a tool within Justice-Centered Science Pedagogy (JCSP) to enhance middle school students' understanding of social justice science issues. It focuses on how system modeling can scaffold students' reasoning about complex social systems, informed by their lived experiences, cultural backgrounds, and social identities. Our research involved 27 middle school students using system models to explore the societal and scientific dimensions of the COVID-19 pandemic. By leveraging the experiences and insights of students, educators can create transformative learning environments that not only recognize but also utilize students' unique knowledge bases as legitimate contributions to classroom discourse. The implications for instructional design highlight the need for multifaceted, responsive activities that align with the principles of JCSP and empower students as agents of societal transformation. The research contributes to the ongoing discourse on enhancing science education through justice-centered approaches that address the complexities of socioscientific context and the cultural relevance of scientific knowledge.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 24(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
10.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.