Chinese Intellectual Thought in Early Qing Dynasty: The Contributions of Gu Yanwu

Abstract Seventeenth-century China was a period of profound upheaval and transformation, marked most prominently by the fall of the Ming Dynasty and the establishment of the Qing Dynasty in 1644, following the entry of Manchu troops into Beijing. This transition not only redefined the political landscape but also generated a deep cultural and moral crisis within Chinese society. The ascension of a foreign ruling class of Manchu origin was met with resistance and unease among the Han Chinese, who struggled to reconcile the loss of the Ming with the legitimacy of the new rulers. This era of uncertainty and disruption challenged long-standing intellectual and social norms, prompting a reevaluation of cultural identity, governance, and moral principles. Among these figures, Gu Yanwu (1613–1682) stands out as a pivotal thinker who sought to address the intellectual stagnation of his time. His critique of Neo-Confucianism was especially significant, as he rejected its overreliance on abstract metaphysical speculation, which he deemed detached from the practical realities of governance and everyday life. Instead, Gu Yanwu advocated for a return to classical Confucian principles, emphasizing empirical study, moral integrity, and practical application of knowledge. This article examines Gu Yanwu’s contributions to Chinese thought, leaving a lasting impact on the trajectory of Chinese scholarship and philosophy in the early Qing period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sæculum
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2024-0020
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese Intellectual Thought in Early Qing Dynasty: The Contributions of Gu Yanwu

Diana-Elena Vereș
Sæculum
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Chinese Intellectual Thought in Early Qing Dynasty: The Contributions of Gu Yanwu

Diana-Elena Vereș
article en

Abstract

Abstract Seventeenth-century China was a period of profound upheaval and transformation, marked most prominently by the fall of the Ming Dynasty and the establishment of the Qing Dynasty in 1644, following the entry of Manchu troops into Beijing. This transition not only redefined the political landscape but also generated a deep cultural and moral crisis within Chinese society. The ascension of a foreign ruling class of Manchu origin was met with resistance and unease among the Han Chinese, who struggled to reconcile the loss of the Ming with the legitimacy of the new rulers. This era of uncertainty and disruption challenged long-standing intellectual and social norms, prompting a reevaluation of cultural identity, governance, and moral principles. Among these figures, Gu Yanwu (1613–1682) stands out as a pivotal thinker who sought to address the intellectual stagnation of his time. His critique of Neo-Confucianism was especially significant, as he rejected its overreliance on abstract metaphysical speculation, which he deemed detached from the practical realities of governance and everyday life. Instead, Gu Yanwu advocated for a return to classical Confucian principles, emphasizing empirical study, moral integrity, and practical application of knowledge. This article examines Gu Yanwu’s contributions to Chinese thought, leaving a lasting impact on the trajectory of Chinese scholarship and philosophy in the early Qing period.

SæculumVol. 58(2)
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.