Evaluating photographic authenticity: How well do ChatGPT 4o and Gemini distinguish between real and AI-generated images?

Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, differentiating between actual and AI-generated images has become an increasingly difficult task. The present exploratory research looks at the capacity of two leading AI models, ChatGPT and Gemini, to correctly classify genuine vs. synthetic photographs in a variety of categories, including wildlife, portraiture, and abstract art. The present research evaluates the accuracy, mistake rates, and handling of complex visual content of both models, shedding light on their strengths and limits and providing significant insights into their possible uses in combatting visual falsehood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sæculum
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2024-0018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating photographic authenticity: How well do ChatGPT 4o and Gemini distinguish between real and AI-generated images?

Eduard-Claudiu Gross
2 citations
Sæculum
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
article

Evaluating photographic authenticity: How well do ChatGPT 4o and Gemini distinguish between real and AI-generated images?

Eduard-Claudiu Gross
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, differentiating between actual and AI-generated images has become an increasingly difficult task. The present exploratory research looks at the capacity of two leading AI models, ChatGPT and Gemini, to correctly classify genuine vs. synthetic photographs in a variety of categories, including wildlife, portraiture, and abstract art. The present research evaluates the accuracy, mistake rates, and handling of complex visual content of both models, shedding light on their strengths and limits and providing significant insights into their possible uses in combatting visual falsehood.

SæculumVol. 58(2)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.