Efficacy of Concentrated Growth Factor with Autograft and Xenograft in Mandible Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF) along with xenograft and autograft in mandible fractures, in terms of bone density gain and healing over the period of 6 months. Methodology: This was a Randomized Clinical Trial conducted at a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi from May 2019 to July 2022. It included patients with mandible fractures requiring bone grafts due to non-union, delayed union, or mal-union. The patients were divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 patients. Group A underwent mandibular surgery using autograft alone, Group B received autograft combined with CGF, and Group C received xenograft combined with CGF. The participants were monitored using serial cone-beam computed tomography at the 4th and 6th months post-operatively to evaluate bone healing and bone density. By the end of the study, all cone-beam CT scans were evaluated for bone density. Results: The results showed a significant increase in bone bulk formation across all three groups between the 4th and 6th month, highlighting the effectiveness of all treatment modalities (p < 0.001). However, intergroup comparison revealed that bone density was comparatively higher in groups B and C, where CGF was used as an adjuvant, than in group A. However, the mean difference in bone density over the 6 months period was similar for Group A (-229.2) and Group B (-227.7), while Group C showed a slightly greater mean difference of -237.9 Conclusion: CGF is equally effective with both autograft and xenograft. However, using CGF with xenograft is preferable, as it helps avoid donor site morbidity and reduces patient inconvenience associated with autograft harvesting. Key words: Autograft, Concentrated Growth Factor, Xenograft, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Mandible

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v4i1.3519
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Trauma and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Concentrated Growth Factor with Autograft and Xenograft in Mandible Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Tahera Ayub, Amna Rehman, Hijab Farid Khan, Arifa Haque et al.
1 citations
Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry
Dental Trauma and Treatments
0.74
article

Efficacy of Concentrated Growth Factor with Autograft and Xenograft in Mandible Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Tahera Ayub, Amna Rehman, Hijab Farid Khan, Arifa Haque, Samreen Malik, Abdul Hafeez Shaikh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF) along with xenograft and autograft in mandible fractures, in terms of bone density gain and healing over the period of 6 months. Methodology: This was a Randomized Clinical Trial conducted at a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi from May 2019 to July 2022. It included patients with mandible fractures requiring bone grafts due to non-union, delayed union, or mal-union. The patients were divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 patients. Group A underwent mandibular surgery using autograft alone, Group B received autograft combined with CGF, and Group C received xenograft combined with CGF. The participants were monitored using serial cone-beam computed tomography at the 4th and 6th months post-operatively to evaluate bone healing and bone density. By the end of the study, all cone-beam CT scans were evaluated for bone density. Results: The results showed a significant increase in bone bulk formation across all three groups between the 4th and 6th month, highlighting the effectiveness of all treatment modalities (p < 0.001). However, intergroup comparison revealed that bone density was comparatively higher in groups B and C, where CGF was used as an adjuvant, than in group A. However, the mean difference in bone density over the 6 months period was similar for Group A (-229.2) and Group B (-227.7), while Group C showed a slightly greater mean difference of -237.9 Conclusion: CGF is equally effective with both autograft and xenograft. However, using CGF with xenograft is preferable, as it helps avoid donor site morbidity and reduces patient inconvenience associated with autograft harvesting. Key words: Autograft, Concentrated Growth Factor, Xenograft, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Mandible

Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry
Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), Liaquat National Hospital (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Dental Trauma and Treatments
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.