Practice Indiscipline: Exploring a Common Ground between Archaeology and Ethnography

Archaeology and ethnography have been seen as closely related disciplines for a long time. One reason for this is that both fields introduced the concept of practice early in their theoretical development. Recently, theoretical debates on practices have undergone several conceptual shifts, enabling new interdisciplinary interactions and transdisciplinary hybridizations. We argue that contemporary theories of social practices are ideally suited to establish a common methodological ground for these fields in three main areas: the field site, materiality and temporality. We suggest using a common conceptual language for these disciplines, incorporating the notions of situatedness, participation and the simultaneous ‘archaeologization of the contemporary’ and ‘contemporization of the archaeological.’ Such a framework can enable (contemporary) archaeologists and (sociological) ethnographers to communicate their research more effectively and potentially foster closer collaborations in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54799/ixem2383
Primary Topic
Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice Indiscipline: Exploring a Common Ground between Archaeology and Ethnography

Johannes Coughlan, Alexander Veling
Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift
Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
article

Practice Indiscipline: Exploring a Common Ground between Archaeology and Ethnography

Johannes Coughlan, Alexander Veling
article en

Abstract

Archaeology and ethnography have been seen as closely related disciplines for a long time. One reason for this is that both fields introduced the concept of practice early in their theoretical development. Recently, theoretical debates on practices have undergone several conceptual shifts, enabling new interdisciplinary interactions and transdisciplinary hybridizations. We argue that contemporary theories of social practices are ideally suited to establish a common methodological ground for these fields in three main areas: the field site, materiality and temporality. We suggest using a common conceptual language for these disciplines, incorporating the notions of situatedness, participation and the simultaneous ‘archaeologization of the contemporary’ and ‘contemporization of the archaeological.’ Such a framework can enable (contemporary) archaeologists and (sociological) ethnographers to communicate their research more effectively and potentially foster closer collaborations in the future.

Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische ZeitschriftVol. 58
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practice Indiscipline: Exploring a Common Ground between Archaeology and Ethnography — Johannes Coughlan, Alexander Veling · Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS