Stay on topic: Topical (mis)alignment between lesson study research activities and its relationship with teachers’ perceived learning

Lesson study (LS) is a collaborative inquiry-oriented approach to teachers’ professional development. Teachers choose a research topic based on a problem they have observed in their students’ learning. During LS, teachers should ideally stay with their research topic to build on it further during all research activities, a process we refer to as ‘topical alignment’. However, in reality, teachers tend to drift away from their research topic. We posit that teams that adhere to their research topic experience more meaningful and profound learning. We explore how novice LS teams topically aligned their research activities and how (mis)alignment could relate to perceived teacher learning. The findings of a cross-case analysis of five audiotaped LS cycles, as well as questionnaire data on teacher learning (n = 17), show that topically aligning research activities is challenging for teams. This study provides concrete practical implications, including a checklist to help LS teams ensure they are maintaining topical alignment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogische Studiën
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59302/htdpe085
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stay on topic: Topical (mis)alignment between lesson study research activities and its relationship with teachers’ perceived learning

Iris Uffen, Nellie Verhoef, Sui Lin Goei, Siebrich de Vries
Pedagogische Studiën
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Stay on topic: Topical (mis)alignment between lesson study research activities and its relationship with teachers’ perceived learning

Iris Uffen, Nellie Verhoef, Sui Lin Goei, Siebrich de Vries
article en

Abstract

Lesson study (LS) is a collaborative inquiry-oriented approach to teachers’ professional development. Teachers choose a research topic based on a problem they have observed in their students’ learning. During LS, teachers should ideally stay with their research topic to build on it further during all research activities, a process we refer to as ‘topical alignment’. However, in reality, teachers tend to drift away from their research topic. We posit that teams that adhere to their research topic experience more meaningful and profound learning. We explore how novice LS teams topically aligned their research activities and how (mis)alignment could relate to perceived teacher learning. The findings of a cross-case analysis of five audiotaped LS cycles, as well as questionnaire data on teacher learning (n = 17), show that topically aligning research activities is challenging for teams. This study provides concrete practical implications, including a checklist to help LS teams ensure they are maintaining topical alignment.

Pedagogische StudiënVol. 101(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.