Self-regulated learning strategies in L1 and L2 reading

Abstract English as a second language (L2) has become the medium of instruction in numerous contexts even though many people may have difficulties to read and study in L2. According to the self-regulated framework, metacognitive strategies are essential to achieve successful learning, but they are resource-consuming and their use might be compromised in demanding contexts such as learning in L2. In Experiment 1, nonbalanced bilinguals read high- and low-cohesion texts in L1 and L2 and self-rated their learning using a judgment of learning (JOL). Then, they answered open-ended questions and responded a customized questionnaire regarding their strategies. In Experiment 2, we introduced two bilingual groups varying in L2 proficiency. Overall, participants could adjust their JOLs and detect the difficulty of the texts correctly in L1 and L2. However, results evidenced some nuances in learning strategies related to L2 proficiency. We discuss these findings within the context of the self-regulated learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000683
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-regulated learning strategies in L1 and L2 reading

M. Teresa Bajo, Marta Cecilia Tapia Reyes, Julia Morales
1 citations
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
0.79
article

Self-regulated learning strategies in L1 and L2 reading

M. Teresa Bajo, Marta Cecilia Tapia Reyes, Julia Morales
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract English as a second language (L2) has become the medium of instruction in numerous contexts even though many people may have difficulties to read and study in L2. According to the self-regulated framework, metacognitive strategies are essential to achieve successful learning, but they are resource-consuming and their use might be compromised in demanding contexts such as learning in L2. In Experiment 1, nonbalanced bilinguals read high- and low-cohesion texts in L1 and L2 and self-rated their learning using a judgment of learning (JOL). Then, they answered open-ended questions and responded a customized questionnaire regarding their strategies. In Experiment 2, we introduced two bilingual groups varying in L2 proficiency. Overall, participants could adjust their JOLs and detect the difficulty of the texts correctly in L1 and L2. However, results evidenced some nuances in learning strategies related to L2 proficiency. We discuss these findings within the context of the self-regulated learning.

Bilingualism Language and CognitionVol. 28(4)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-regulated learning strategies in L1 and L2 reading — M. Teresa Bajo, Marta Cecilia Tapia Reyes, et al. · Bilingualism Language and Cognition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS