A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation Compared with Standard Ureteroscopy: 30-Day Results of the ASPIRE Study

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We report the first multicenter, prospective, randomized noninferiority controlled trial of steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) for nephrolithiasis treatment. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Candidates for laser lithotripsy ≥18 years with ≥1 renal stone ≥7 mm and 7-20 mm stone burden were randomized 1:1 SURE <i>vs</i> ureteroscopy (URS). SURE was performed using the CVAC Aspiration System, a novel steerable irrigation-aspiration catheter. The primary efficacy end point was noninferiority in stone-free rate (SFR) based on zero residual fragments (RFs) 30 days postprocedure on noncontrast computed tomography. Secondary end points were superiority tests, stone clearance (percent stone volume reduction), residual stone volume (RSV), SFR (no RF >2 mm), and SFR (no RF >4 mm) 30 days postprocedure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the subjects, 123 were randomized and 101 qualified for efficacy analysis (SURE 46 <i>vs</i> URS 55). Despite randomization, baseline URS stone volume was higher (SURE 485.0 ± 432.5 mm<sup>3</sup> <i>vs</i> URS 713.3 ± 558.5 mm<sup>3</sup>). The primary noninferiority end point was achieved (SURE SFR 48% <i>vs</i> URS SFR 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.027, -1.3% [90% confidence interval; -18%, 15%]). Stone clearance was significantly higher for SURE <i>vs</i> URS subjects (SURE 96.9 ± 5.6% <i>vs</i> URS 92.9 ± 11.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.036); RSV was significantly lower (SURE 14.3 ± 3 0.9 mm<sup>3</sup> <i>vs</i> URS 70.2 ± 144.9 mm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.012). SURE stone clearance and RSV were independent of baseline stone volume, but for URS degraded with increasing baseline stone volume. Safety was comparable between groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> SFR for SURE subjects was noninferior compared with URS subjects; stone clearance and RSV were significantly better with SURE, independent of baseline stone volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0602
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation Compared with Standard Ureteroscopy: 30-Day Results of the ASPIRE Study

Karen Stern, Robert Medairos, Kaitlan Cobb, Jay Page et al.
13 citations
Journal of Endourology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
5.45
article

A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation Compared with Standard Ureteroscopy: 30-Day Results of the ASPIRE Study

Karen Stern, Robert Medairos, Kaitlan Cobb, Jay Page, Robert I Barsky, Ilya Sobol, Glenn M. Preminger, Charles G. Marguet, Mark White, Naren Nimmagadda, Brett A. Johnson, Michael D Levin, Thomas Mueller, David Cuellar, J. Stuart Wolf, Brian R. Matlaga, Thomas Chi, Loren Jones
article en
13 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We report the first multicenter, prospective, randomized noninferiority controlled trial of steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) for nephrolithiasis treatment. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Candidates for laser lithotripsy ≥18 years with ≥1 renal stone ≥7 mm and 7-20 mm stone burden were randomized 1:1 SURE <i>vs</i> ureteroscopy (URS). SURE was performed using the CVAC Aspiration System, a novel steerable irrigation-aspiration catheter. The primary efficacy end point was noninferiority in stone-free rate (SFR) based on zero residual fragments (RFs) 30 days postprocedure on noncontrast computed tomography. Secondary end points were superiority tests, stone clearance (percent stone volume reduction), residual stone volume (RSV), SFR (no RF >2 mm), and SFR (no RF >4 mm) 30 days postprocedure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the subjects, 123 were randomized and 101 qualified for efficacy analysis (SURE 46 <i>vs</i> URS 55). Despite randomization, baseline URS stone volume was higher (SURE 485.0 ± 432.5 mm<sup>3</sup> <i>vs</i> URS 713.3 ± 558.5 mm<sup>3</sup>). The primary noninferiority end point was achieved (SURE SFR 48% <i>vs</i> URS SFR 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.027, -1.3% [90% confidence interval; -18%, 15%]). Stone clearance was significantly higher for SURE <i>vs</i> URS subjects (SURE 96.9 ± 5.6% <i>vs</i> URS 92.9 ± 11.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.036); RSV was significantly lower (SURE 14.3 ± 3 0.9 mm<sup>3</sup> <i>vs</i> URS 70.2 ± 144.9 mm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.012). SURE stone clearance and RSV were independent of baseline stone volume, but for URS degraded with increasing baseline stone volume. Safety was comparable between groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> SFR for SURE subjects was noninferior compared with URS subjects; stone clearance and RSV were significantly better with SURE, independent of baseline stone volume.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 39(1)
Prisma Health (US), University of Arizona (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Arizona Science Center (US), Urology of Virginia (US), Austin Diagnostic Clinic (US), Summit Medical Group (United States) (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Duke University Health System (US), Arizona Oncology (US), Tucson Orthopaedic Institute (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.