Dynamic Evaluation of Adaptive Product Design Concepts Using m-Polar Linguistic Z-Numbers

Adaptive design focuses on creating flexible products that meet evolving demands and enhance sustainability. However, evaluating adaptive design concepts poses significant challenges due to the dynamic nature of product features over time and the inherent uncertainty in decision-makers’ (DMs’) evaluations. Most traditional frameworks rely on static models that fail to capture the temporal evolution of attributes and often overlook decision-makers’ (DMs’) confidence levels, resulting in incomplete or unreliable evaluations. To bridge these gaps, we propose the m-polar linguistic Z-number (mLZN) to address these issues. This framework uses the dynamic representation capabilities of m-polar fuzzy sets (mFSs) and the symmetrical structure of linguistic Z-numbers (LZNs), which effectively integrate linguistic evaluations with corresponding confidence levels, providing a balanced and robust approach to handling uncertainty. This approach models design characteristics across multiple periods while accounting for DMs’ confidence levels. Based on this framework, we develop mLZN weighted and geometric aggregation operators, computation rules, and ranking methods to support dynamic multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM). The proposed framework’s effectiveness is demonstrated through a case study on adaptive furniture design for children, which showcases its ability to dynamically evaluate key attributes, including safety, ease of use, fun, and comfort. Furthermore, we validate its robustness and feasibility through comprehensive sensitivity and comparative analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121686
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Evaluation of Adaptive Product Design Concepts Using m-Polar Linguistic Z-Numbers

Zhifeng Zhao, Qinghua Liu
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Dynamic Evaluation of Adaptive Product Design Concepts Using m-Polar Linguistic Z-Numbers

Zhifeng Zhao, Qinghua Liu
article en

Abstract

Adaptive design focuses on creating flexible products that meet evolving demands and enhance sustainability. However, evaluating adaptive design concepts poses significant challenges due to the dynamic nature of product features over time and the inherent uncertainty in decision-makers’ (DMs’) evaluations. Most traditional frameworks rely on static models that fail to capture the temporal evolution of attributes and often overlook decision-makers’ (DMs’) confidence levels, resulting in incomplete or unreliable evaluations. To bridge these gaps, we propose the m-polar linguistic Z-number (mLZN) to address these issues. This framework uses the dynamic representation capabilities of m-polar fuzzy sets (mFSs) and the symmetrical structure of linguistic Z-numbers (LZNs), which effectively integrate linguistic evaluations with corresponding confidence levels, providing a balanced and robust approach to handling uncertainty. This approach models design characteristics across multiple periods while accounting for DMs’ confidence levels. Based on this framework, we develop mLZN weighted and geometric aggregation operators, computation rules, and ranking methods to support dynamic multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM). The proposed framework’s effectiveness is demonstrated through a case study on adaptive furniture design for children, which showcases its ability to dynamically evaluate key attributes, including safety, ease of use, fun, and comfort. Furthermore, we validate its robustness and feasibility through comprehensive sensitivity and comparative analyses.

SymmetryVol. 16(12)
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Soochow University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.