Defense-Related Enzyme Activities and Metabolomic Analysis Reveal Differentially Accumulated Metabolites and Response Pathways for Sheath Blight Resistance in Rice
Rice sheath blight (RSB), caused by the pathogenic fungus <i>Rhizoctonia solani</i>, poses a significant threat to global food security. The defense mechanisms employed by rice against RSB are not well understood. In our study, we analyzed the interactions between rice and <i>R. solani</i> by comparing the phenotypic changes, ROS content, and metabolite variations in both tolerant and susceptible rice varieties during the early stages of fungal infection. Notably, there were distinct phenotypic differences in the response to <i>R. solani</i> between the tolerant cultivar Zhengdao22 (ZD) and the susceptible cultivar Xinzhi No.1 (XZ). We observed that the activities of five defense-related enzymes in both tolerant and susceptible cultivars changed dynamically from 0 to 72 h post-infection with <i>R. solani</i>. In particular, the activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase were closely associated with resistance to RSB. Metabolomic analysis revealed 825 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) between the tolerant and susceptible varieties, with 493 DAMs responding to <i>R. solani</i> infection. Among these, lipids and lipid-like molecules, organic oxygen compounds, phenylpropanoids and polyketides, organoheterocyclic compounds, and organic acids and their derivatives were the most significantly enriched. One DAM, P-coumaraldehyde, which responded to <i>R. solani</i> infection, was found to effectively inhibit the growth of <i>R. solani</i>, <i>Magnaporthe grisea</i>, and <i>Ustilaginoidea virens</i>. Additionally, multiple metabolic pathways, including amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, are likely involved in RSB resistance. Our research provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the interaction between rice and <i>R. solani</i>.
Authors
- Jingping Su
- Heng Yi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1925-6607)
- Xiurong Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-9445)
- Guangsheng Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6465-2290)
- Yujiao Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-4332)
- Zhongqiu Cui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6081-5342)
- Shuangyong Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-4984)
- Jianfei Huo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-8950)
- Yuejiao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-2484)
- Zhibin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8408-4479)
- Yue Sun
- Shengjun Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-2037)
- Shuqin Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7225-9687)
Institutions
- Tianjin Agricultural University (CN)
- Institute of Plant Protection (CN)
- Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Plants
- Published
- 2024-12-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13243554
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.00