Spinal Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia in the Endoscopic Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Critical Evaluation Focusing on the Total Anesthesia Time
Our results demonstrated well that both spinal and general anesthesia methods could be applied in a successful and safe manner in the endoscopic management of proximal ureteral stones. However, a shorter total anesthesia time under spinal anesthesia could be anticipated during endoscopic management of proximal ureteral stones.
Authors
- Selahattin Bedir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-9217)
- Yasin Yitgin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-6941)
- Fahri Yavuz İlki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-3815)
- Emine Yitgin
- Fatih Üstün (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-2308)
- Ali Sezer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-2610)
- Ela Erten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-5625)
- Emre Bülbül (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-1264)
- Kemal Sarıca (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-1313)
Institutions
- State Hospital (GB)
- Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR)
- Biruni University (TR)
- Istinye University (TR)
- Konya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
- Ford Otosan (Turkey) (TR)
- University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Urologia Internationalis
- Published
- 2024-12-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000543203
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.57