Evaluating environmental, weather, and management influences for sustainable beekeeping in California and Quebec: Enhancing beehive survival predictions

Concerned about declining managed honeybee populations in North America, this study employed the random survival forest (RSF) model to assess beehive mortality, considering 18 diverse environmental, weather, and management practices. Our analysis focused on 15,906 and 6,690 beehives in California state, United States, and Quebec province, Canada for 2023, respectively. The accuracy of the RSF model was assessed through three accuracy metrics, namely concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score (IBS), and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Besides, the variables' importance was assessed in both California and Quebec under two criteria configurations, incorporating beehive management criteria and excluding such criteria. Including beehive-management criteria improved accuracy: for the test dataset in California, C-index of 0.8845, IBS of 0.0177, and time-dependent AUC of 0.8819; in Quebec, C-index of 0.9618, IBS of 0.0121, and time-dependent AUC of 0.9687. Comparing feature importance across the regions revealed differences, with sugar-feeding frequency, precipitation, and Miticide-treatment frequency exerting more influence in California and DEM, precipitation, and sugar-feeding frequency playing more substantial roles in Quebec. Beekeeping suitability maps for both regions were provided, classifying land suitability for beekeeping into five categories from very low to very high. By aggregating the areas classified as highly and very highly suitable for beekeeping, the beekeeping suitability maps indicated that 64.712% of California and 66.423% of Quebec exhibit suitable conditions for beekeeping. This study could contribute to reducing honeybee colony losses and supporting the advancement of sustainable agriculture in California and Quebec through 1) pinpointing essential environmental, ecological, and meteorological factors, alongside beehive management practices affecting beehive mortality, and 2) providing maps illustrating land suitability for beekeeping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123783
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating environmental, weather, and management influences for sustainable beekeeping in California and Quebec: Enhancing beehive survival predictions

Navid Mahdizadeh Gharakhanlou, Liliana Pérez, Evan Henry
4 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Insect and Pesticide Research
2.16
article

Evaluating environmental, weather, and management influences for sustainable beekeeping in California and Quebec: Enhancing beehive survival predictions

Navid Mahdizadeh Gharakhanlou, Liliana Pérez, Evan Henry
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Concerned about declining managed honeybee populations in North America, this study employed the random survival forest (RSF) model to assess beehive mortality, considering 18 diverse environmental, weather, and management practices. Our analysis focused on 15,906 and 6,690 beehives in California state, United States, and Quebec province, Canada for 2023, respectively. The accuracy of the RSF model was assessed through three accuracy metrics, namely concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score (IBS), and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Besides, the variables' importance was assessed in both California and Quebec under two criteria configurations, incorporating beehive management criteria and excluding such criteria. Including beehive-management criteria improved accuracy: for the test dataset in California, C-index of 0.8845, IBS of 0.0177, and time-dependent AUC of 0.8819; in Quebec, C-index of 0.9618, IBS of 0.0121, and time-dependent AUC of 0.9687. Comparing feature importance across the regions revealed differences, with sugar-feeding frequency, precipitation, and Miticide-treatment frequency exerting more influence in California and DEM, precipitation, and sugar-feeding frequency playing more substantial roles in Quebec. Beekeeping suitability maps for both regions were provided, classifying land suitability for beekeeping into five categories from very low to very high. By aggregating the areas classified as highly and very highly suitable for beekeeping, the beekeeping suitability maps indicated that 64.712% of California and 66.423% of Quebec exhibit suitable conditions for beekeeping. This study could contribute to reducing honeybee colony losses and supporting the advancement of sustainable agriculture in California and Quebec through 1) pinpointing essential environmental, ecological, and meteorological factors, alongside beehive management practices affecting beehive mortality, and 2) providing maps illustrating land suitability for beekeeping.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), McGill University (CA)
Mitacs, Institut de Valorisation des Données, Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Insect and Pesticide Research
2.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.