Federal democracy: the very idea

This commentary reflects upon federalism as a distinct category of constitutionalism, one that has often been misconstrued by those who view the federal idea either through a moral-normative lens or with a fixed conception of institutional determinism. Construing federalism through the modern turn in constitutionalism is essential both to locate it within contemporary constitutional thinking and to draw out its distinctiveness, liberating the idea from contested moral precepts and from misleading and ultimately circular conceptions of federal design. In doing so, the commentary reflects upon Cheryl Saunders’ contribution to federal studies and in particular to the relationship between federalism and democracy. The commentary also seeks to demonstrate that the connection between federalism and democracy need not be addressed as a normative aspiration, but is in fact axiomatic within the federal idea itself. It does so, however, by arguing that federal democracy takes on its own character and that key to understanding this is to recognise the distinctive constitutional subjecthood which characterises any federal constitution. To this end federalism, and the model of democracy that attends it, must be understood primarily through the register of constitutional, rather than political, theory.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Constitutional Studies
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/ccs.2024.0029
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federal democracy: the very idea

Stephen Tierney
Comparative Constitutional Studies
Political Systems and Governance
article

Federal democracy: the very idea

Stephen Tierney
article en

Abstract

This commentary reflects upon federalism as a distinct category of constitutionalism, one that has often been misconstrued by those who view the federal idea either through a moral-normative lens or with a fixed conception of institutional determinism. Construing federalism through the modern turn in constitutionalism is essential both to locate it within contemporary constitutional thinking and to draw out its distinctiveness, liberating the idea from contested moral precepts and from misleading and ultimately circular conceptions of federal design. In doing so, the commentary reflects upon Cheryl Saunders’ contribution to federal studies and in particular to the relationship between federalism and democracy. The commentary also seeks to demonstrate that the connection between federalism and democracy need not be addressed as a normative aspiration, but is in fact axiomatic within the federal idea itself. It does so, however, by arguing that federal democracy takes on its own character and that key to understanding this is to recognise the distinctive constitutional subjecthood which characterises any federal constitution. To this end federalism, and the model of democracy that attends it, must be understood primarily through the register of constitutional, rather than political, theory.

Comparative Constitutional StudiesVol. 2(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.