An evaluation framework and comparative analysis of the widely used learning management systems

Learning Management System (LMS) is a major tool used in most universities and institutions for online/distance education purposes. A variety of LM systems are being used in different universities and institutions, and these LM systems are also updating their versions and patches to stay in the competition. Hence, the selection of an appropriate LMS is an important task as it is going to influence the academic proceedings of an academic institution. There are a few online comparison sheets available for different LMS, which have been scored based on online feedback, but those online comparisons lack a comprehensive features list for the comparison, and are unable to provide a generalized scoring function to compute the suitability score for an LMS. This article proposes a framework to evaluate an LMS based on a detailed list of features and functions. This evaluation is scored through a generalized scoring function that computes the quantitative score of LM systems. Lastly, some widely used open access and proprietary LM systems have been evaluated using the proposed framework and scoring function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311111
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation framework and comparative analysis of the widely used learning management systems

Adnan Tufail, Kashif Ishaq, Naeem A. Nawaz, Irfan Abid et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Online and Blended Learning
6.29
article

An evaluation framework and comparative analysis of the widely used learning management systems

Adnan Tufail, Kashif Ishaq, Naeem A. Nawaz, Irfan Abid, Osama M. Salem, Uzma Farooq, Adnan Abid
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Learning Management System (LMS) is a major tool used in most universities and institutions for online/distance education purposes. A variety of LM systems are being used in different universities and institutions, and these LM systems are also updating their versions and patches to stay in the competition. Hence, the selection of an appropriate LMS is an important task as it is going to influence the academic proceedings of an academic institution. There are a few online comparison sheets available for different LMS, which have been scored based on online feedback, but those online comparisons lack a comprehensive features list for the comparison, and are unable to provide a generalized scoring function to compute the suitability score for an LMS. This article proposes a framework to evaluate an LMS based on a detailed list of features and functions. This evaluation is scored through a generalized scoring function that computes the quantitative score of LM systems. Lastly, some widely used open access and proprietary LM systems have been evaluated using the proposed framework and scoring function.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(12)
University of the Punjab (PK), Umm al-Qura University (SA), University of Management and Technology (PK), National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Online and Blended Learning
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.