The Political Economy of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in European Oral Health Policy

Prioritization in oral health policy seems to be dominated by fragmented investments in incremental services of delivery rather than synergized reforms such as granular package designs. While some contexts showed political traction for oral health policy, complex negotiations strained by interests of private professionals and challenges of limited evidence result in difficulties in constraining oral health care within public spending targets. This has placed oral health policy in a state of inertia, where insufficient public resources meet the force of content exerted by the private sector.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This study can inform policy makers and researchers to understand the various stakeholder roles in maintaining the status quo of oral health policy and the processes creating the bottlenecks preventing progression in improving oral health care systems. This understanding could lead to novel approaches to oral health policy making and the appropriate data acquisition and analysis to aid oral health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844241302052
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Economy of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in European Oral Health Policy

Shaila Akter, Stefan Listl, Patrick Jeurissen, Z. Sarroukh
1 citations
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
article

The Political Economy of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in European Oral Health Policy

Shaila Akter, Stefan Listl, Patrick Jeurissen, Z. Sarroukh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Prioritization in oral health policy seems to be dominated by fragmented investments in incremental services of delivery rather than synergized reforms such as granular package designs. While some contexts showed political traction for oral health policy, complex negotiations strained by interests of private professionals and challenges of limited evidence result in difficulties in constraining oral health care within public spending targets. This has placed oral health policy in a state of inertia, where insufficient public resources meet the force of content exerted by the private sector.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This study can inform policy makers and researchers to understand the various stakeholder roles in maintaining the status quo of oral health policy and the processes creating the bottlenecks preventing progression in improving oral health care systems. This understanding could lead to novel approaches to oral health policy making and the appropriate data acquisition and analysis to aid oral health policy.

JDR Clinical & Translational ResearchVol. 10(4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
HORIZON EUROPE Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.