Failure to Launch: Tracing the Trajectory of Democratic Innovation Adoption in Canada

Abstract Canada is regarded as an early adopter of democratic innovations, including the high-profile BC Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. To what extent has Canada maintained this trajectory? We examine this in the context of breadth and depth by examining trends in adoption over time across Canada and case-level adoption according to the dimensions of influence and temporality. While case studies of Canadian democratic innovations exist, these do not provide analytical capacity to understand trends in the breadth of adoption; we thus contribute a novel dataset of democratic innovations in Canada from 2000 to 2020. To analyze the depth of adoption, we present a two-by-three framework, which we apply to interpret our dataset of Canadian democratic innovations. We find that while there is an increase in the total number of democratic innovations, a low quantity is observed that exhibits high influence and permanence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423924000325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure to Launch: Tracing the Trajectory of Democratic Innovation Adoption in Canada

Megan Mattes, Joanna Massie
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Policy Transfer and Learning
2.23
article

Failure to Launch: Tracing the Trajectory of Democratic Innovation Adoption in Canada

Megan Mattes, Joanna Massie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Canada is regarded as an early adopter of democratic innovations, including the high-profile BC Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. To what extent has Canada maintained this trajectory? We examine this in the context of breadth and depth by examining trends in adoption over time across Canada and case-level adoption according to the dimensions of influence and temporality. While case studies of Canadian democratic innovations exist, these do not provide analytical capacity to understand trends in the breadth of adoption; we thus contribute a novel dataset of democratic innovations in Canada from 2000 to 2020. To analyze the depth of adoption, we present a two-by-three framework, which we apply to interpret our dataset of Canadian democratic innovations. We find that while there is an increase in the total number of democratic innovations, a low quantity is observed that exhibits high influence and permanence.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 57(4)
Simon Fraser University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
McMaster University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Policy Transfer and Learning
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Failure to Launch: Tracing the Trajectory of Democratic Innovation Adoption in Canada — Megan Mattes, Joanna Massie · Canadian Journal of Political Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS