The Ideological Factor of Internet Governance in China: Features and Tools in the Context of Confrontation with the United States

The Internet turned into an arena of ideological struggle. It benefits those who have control over data flows and opinion market. In the information space, previously insurmountable barriers are easily bypassed, the number of generators of “narratives” is increasing exponentially. Strategic success achieved in the information field can have a significance comparable to political or military success. An example is the confrontation between key players in cyberspace — the US and China. Their statehood is based on ideology — left-wing liberalism, transhumanism and americano-centric globalism on the one hand, innovative Marxism and socialism with Chinese characteristics on the other. Despite differences in fundamental values, political and social systems, Washington and Beijing actively use Internet tools to seek support, expand governance and propaganda. The winners in the ideological struggle are not yet clear. But certain dynamics can be fixed. The US has to admit that its belief in the ubiquity of liberal democracy and the “technological optimism” of the early 21st century have not been justified. The Internet has failed to change China – China has changed the Internet for itself. The political and ideological conditions of the PRC and the efforts of the CPC have formed unique parameters for the development of network. The party managed to create a system of distributed control over the Internet, users and content, allowing leadership to manage the situation on the “battlefield”. The US and its allies in the fight against “autocrats and authoritarians” are increasingly slipping into the fight against dissent in their own countries. During this struggle the West is becoming more intolerant and authoritarian.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemy Dalnego Vostoka
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s0131281224050026
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ideological Factor of Internet Governance in China: Features and Tools in the Context of Confrontation with the United States

Dmitry V. Trenin, Alexandra Yankova
Problemy Dalnego Vostoka
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

The Ideological Factor of Internet Governance in China: Features and Tools in the Context of Confrontation with the United States

Dmitry V. Trenin, Alexandra Yankova
article en

Abstract

The Internet turned into an arena of ideological struggle. It benefits those who have control over data flows and opinion market. In the information space, previously insurmountable barriers are easily bypassed, the number of generators of “narratives” is increasing exponentially. Strategic success achieved in the information field can have a significance comparable to political or military success. An example is the confrontation between key players in cyberspace — the US and China. Their statehood is based on ideology — left-wing liberalism, transhumanism and americano-centric globalism on the one hand, innovative Marxism and socialism with Chinese characteristics on the other. Despite differences in fundamental values, political and social systems, Washington and Beijing actively use Internet tools to seek support, expand governance and propaganda. The winners in the ideological struggle are not yet clear. But certain dynamics can be fixed. The US has to admit that its belief in the ubiquity of liberal democracy and the “technological optimism” of the early 21st century have not been justified. The Internet has failed to change China – China has changed the Internet for itself. The political and ideological conditions of the PRC and the efforts of the CPC have formed unique parameters for the development of network. The party managed to create a system of distributed control over the Internet, users and content, allowing leadership to manage the situation on the “battlefield”. The US and its allies in the fight against “autocrats and authoritarians” are increasingly slipping into the fight against dissent in their own countries. During this struggle the West is becoming more intolerant and authoritarian.

Problemy Dalnego Vostoka(5)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
University of Cambridge, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.