China's Approach to “Reset” System of Global Economic Governance in the Context of Structural Power Theory

Globalization, which contributed to the maintenance of the neoliberal world order, slowed down after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1998 and the World Financial Crisis of 2008, when the existing system of global economic governance was unable to support developing countries, strengthening the trend towards regionalization and localization. China, acting as a rising power in the process of “power transition,” has focused its efforts on transforming the system of global governance that has so far provided US hegemony. While initially successfully using globalization for integration into the world economy, China has changed its role in the system of global governance and has become empowered to establish and maintain new global governance structures. China adopted a strategy of expanding its activities in traditional international institutions (UN, WB, IMF) and establishing parallel international institutions (BRI, AIIB) to push forward its perspective of the world order. The US adopted a strategy of decoupling to limit Chinese capabilities in its sphere of influence in response to China's economic rise. On the one hand, this led to the emergence of trade and techno-economic blocs, but on the other hand, China's approach preserved the possibility of participation in its institutions for countries which are considered to be the “core” of the existing economic order (G7, G20, OECD). The author concludes that in the present context China adheres to a non-conflict asymmetric approach to reforming the system of global governance in the economic sphere, which implies global distribution of norms through the UN, G20 and BRICS and re-globalization of global trade through intensification of regional cooperation with Asian, African and Latin American countries within the framework of the BRI, forums for cooperation between regional organizations and China, and integration of developing countries into parallel financial institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemy Dalnego Vostoka
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s0131281224050012
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's Approach to “Reset” System of Global Economic Governance in the Context of Structural Power Theory

Mirzet S. Ramich
24 links
Problemy Dalnego Vostoka
International Development and Aid
article

China's Approach to “Reset” System of Global Economic Governance in the Context of Structural Power Theory

Mirzet S. Ramich
article en

Abstract

Globalization, which contributed to the maintenance of the neoliberal world order, slowed down after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1998 and the World Financial Crisis of 2008, when the existing system of global economic governance was unable to support developing countries, strengthening the trend towards regionalization and localization. China, acting as a rising power in the process of “power transition,” has focused its efforts on transforming the system of global governance that has so far provided US hegemony. While initially successfully using globalization for integration into the world economy, China has changed its role in the system of global governance and has become empowered to establish and maintain new global governance structures. China adopted a strategy of expanding its activities in traditional international institutions (UN, WB, IMF) and establishing parallel international institutions (BRI, AIIB) to push forward its perspective of the world order. The US adopted a strategy of decoupling to limit Chinese capabilities in its sphere of influence in response to China's economic rise. On the one hand, this led to the emergence of trade and techno-economic blocs, but on the other hand, China's approach preserved the possibility of participation in its institutions for countries which are considered to be the “core” of the existing economic order (G7, G20, OECD). The author concludes that in the present context China adheres to a non-conflict asymmetric approach to reforming the system of global governance in the economic sphere, which implies global distribution of norms through the UN, G20 and BRICS and re-globalization of global trade through intensification of regional cooperation with Asian, African and Latin American countries within the framework of the BRI, forums for cooperation between regional organizations and China, and integration of developing countries into parallel financial institutions.

Problemy Dalnego Vostoka(5)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Fund for Astrophysical Research
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China's Approach to “Reset” System of Global Economic Governance in the Context of Structural Power Theory — Mirzet S. Ramich · Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS