The Hunt for Holocene Abrupt Climate Change

Abrupt Climate Change (ACC) is one of the biggest unknowns of the modern climate system, posing a critical risk to ecosystems and human lives. Climate models struggle to simulate ACCs, underestimating the amplitude of climate variability at decade-plus timescales, and at identifying tipping points with significant accuracy. Paleoclimate records are therefore critical in assessing the magnitude, spatial footprint and impact of ACCs. However, the detection of ACCs in individual paleoclimate studies exceeds its prevalence in statistical summaries. Could this reflect confirmation bias in individual studies, statistical limitations in syntheses, or a language barrier between methodologies? We propose a distinction between an "impact sphere" where the climate impact of ACC is of unusual magnitude, and a "detection sphere" where the climate impact of ACC is detectable but not unusual. This framework will aid paleoclimate inferences and climate modelling of ACCs and help discussions on ecosystem disturbance and societal upheavals, both past and future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000547
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Hunt for Holocene Abrupt Climate Change

Nicholas P. McKay, Nick Scroxton
3 citations
PLOS Climate
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.13
article

The Hunt for Holocene Abrupt Climate Change

Nicholas P. McKay, Nick Scroxton
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abrupt Climate Change (ACC) is one of the biggest unknowns of the modern climate system, posing a critical risk to ecosystems and human lives. Climate models struggle to simulate ACCs, underestimating the amplitude of climate variability at decade-plus timescales, and at identifying tipping points with significant accuracy. Paleoclimate records are therefore critical in assessing the magnitude, spatial footprint and impact of ACCs. However, the detection of ACCs in individual paleoclimate studies exceeds its prevalence in statistical summaries. Could this reflect confirmation bias in individual studies, statistical limitations in syntheses, or a language barrier between methodologies? We propose a distinction between an "impact sphere" where the climate impact of ACC is of unusual magnitude, and a "detection sphere" where the climate impact of ACC is detectable but not unusual. This framework will aid paleoclimate inferences and climate modelling of ACCs and help discussions on ecosystem disturbance and societal upheavals, both past and future.

PLOS ClimateVol. 3(12)
University College Dublin (IE), Northern Arizona University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.