A co-designed intervention to support people living with achalasia to eat in a social setting: a feasibility study

This study explored the feasibility of recruiting and retaining people living with achalasia in intervention research, highlighting the acceptability of the co-designed intervention to improve social eating experiences. However, with a retention rate of only 50% at follow-up, it is evident that future studies should explore the reason behind this and also consider recruiting a larger baseline sample to ensure the target is achieved. The positive outcomes of the co-designed intervention underscore the importance of user involvement in developing interventions. The intervention demonstrated the potential to support people living with achalasia in eating in a social setting. The co-designed intervention has significant practical implications by providing healthcare professionals and support groups with a feasible, potentially effective method to enhance the social eating experience of people living with achalasia, potentially improving their overall quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01574-5
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A co-designed intervention to support people living with achalasia to eat in a social setting: a feasibility study

Rosemary Lim, Amelia Hollywood, Majid Hashemi, Melika Kalantari
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

A co-designed intervention to support people living with achalasia to eat in a social setting: a feasibility study

Rosemary Lim, Amelia Hollywood, Majid Hashemi, Melika Kalantari
article en

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of recruiting and retaining people living with achalasia in intervention research, highlighting the acceptability of the co-designed intervention to improve social eating experiences. However, with a retention rate of only 50% at follow-up, it is evident that future studies should explore the reason behind this and also consider recruiting a larger baseline sample to ensure the target is achieved. The positive outcomes of the co-designed intervention underscore the importance of user involvement in developing interventions. The intervention demonstrated the potential to support people living with achalasia in eating in a social setting. The co-designed intervention has significant practical implications by providing healthcare professionals and support groups with a feasible, potentially effective method to enhance the social eating experience of people living with achalasia, potentially improving their overall quality of life.

Pilot and Feasibility StudiesVol. 10(1)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A co-designed intervention to support people living with achalasia to eat in a social setting: a feasibility study — Rosemary Lim, Amelia Hollywood, et al. · Pilot and Feasibility Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS