Borrowings in the Tunisian dialect from Turkish and European languages in their historical context

In the context of a linguistic and historical review, the article examines the modern Tunisian dialect of the Arabic language as the fruit of various layers (substrates, adstrates and superstrates) and the features of borrowing in the dialect from the "external" Italian, French and Turkish languages, as having the most lasting influence. At the same time, it should be noted either the locality or fragmentation of research on the problem of borrowings in the Tunisian dialect, in this regard, the scientific novelty of the work can be designated as a contribution to the generalization of data on borrowings in Tunisian dialect Arabic. The purpose of this study is to identify ways in which the Tunisian dialect borrows European and Turkish foreign language vocabulary. As a result of the study, we see that the historical "stratification" on Tunisian soil did not lead to an ethnic mosaic, as in other countries. The common geography and history have left a trace of a specific identity with a strong tendency towards unity with all the diversity of origins and borrowings. The ancient and modern history of the country confirms that this diversity has always been expressed in the linguistic environment: Berber, Latin, Arabic, Judeo-Arabic, Turkish, French coexisted with each other in different eras. This is a mixture that well explains the evolution of Tunisian society in different historical periods and proportionally reflects the weight of different cultures that have left or are leaving a mark on a given territory. The current language situation in Tunisia is an illustration of the phenomenon under study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philology Theory & Practice
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240641
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Borrowings in the Tunisian dialect from Turkish and European languages in their historical context

Aleksandra Dmitrievna Yagafarova, Stepan Dmitrievich Bokhonskiy
Philology Theory & Practice
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

Borrowings in the Tunisian dialect from Turkish and European languages in their historical context

Aleksandra Dmitrievna Yagafarova, Stepan Dmitrievich Bokhonskiy
article en

Abstract

In the context of a linguistic and historical review, the article examines the modern Tunisian dialect of the Arabic language as the fruit of various layers (substrates, adstrates and superstrates) and the features of borrowing in the dialect from the "external" Italian, French and Turkish languages, as having the most lasting influence. At the same time, it should be noted either the locality or fragmentation of research on the problem of borrowings in the Tunisian dialect, in this regard, the scientific novelty of the work can be designated as a contribution to the generalization of data on borrowings in Tunisian dialect Arabic. The purpose of this study is to identify ways in which the Tunisian dialect borrows European and Turkish foreign language vocabulary. As a result of the study, we see that the historical "stratification" on Tunisian soil did not lead to an ethnic mosaic, as in other countries. The common geography and history have left a trace of a specific identity with a strong tendency towards unity with all the diversity of origins and borrowings. The ancient and modern history of the country confirms that this diversity has always been expressed in the linguistic environment: Berber, Latin, Arabic, Judeo-Arabic, Turkish, French coexisted with each other in different eras. This is a mixture that well explains the evolution of Tunisian society in different historical periods and proportionally reflects the weight of different cultures that have left or are leaving a mark on a given territory. The current language situation in Tunisia is an illustration of the phenomenon under study.

Philology Theory & PracticeVol. 17(12)
St Petersburg University (RU), Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.