Addressing bias in the use of buffers for focal and geographically weighted analyses

Focal analyses (also known as ‘buffer’ or ‘neighbourhood’ analyses) seek to characterise a location based on its surroundings and are commonplace in GIS applications across many fields and disciplines. However, the implicit assumptions made by researchers in these analyses result in an unintended bias towards the periphery of the focal window, which we term Focal Area Bias (FAB). FAB can have a substantial impact upon the resulting values, and in the most extreme cases can result in paradoxical outcomes. Where geographical weighting functions are used, the interaction between the weighting function and FAB means that it will not have the expected effect, leading to the misinterpretation of results. This research characterises the issue of FAB, before presenting a corrective function to remove it. The efficacy of the proposed corrective function and the spatial characteristics of FAB are then evaluated to demonstrate the importance of this issue. We recommend that researchers and practitioners should consider the impact of FAB when undertaking focal analysis and make use of the corrective functions presented here to remove this issue, particularly where geographical weighting is desired.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2440048
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing bias in the use of buffers for focal and geographically weighted analyses

Jonny Huck, S.M. Labib, Matthew Dennis
3 citations
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.39
article

Addressing bias in the use of buffers for focal and geographically weighted analyses

Jonny Huck, S.M. Labib, Matthew Dennis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Focal analyses (also known as ‘buffer’ or ‘neighbourhood’ analyses) seek to characterise a location based on its surroundings and are commonplace in GIS applications across many fields and disciplines. However, the implicit assumptions made by researchers in these analyses result in an unintended bias towards the periphery of the focal window, which we term Focal Area Bias (FAB). FAB can have a substantial impact upon the resulting values, and in the most extreme cases can result in paradoxical outcomes. Where geographical weighting functions are used, the interaction between the weighting function and FAB means that it will not have the expected effect, leading to the misinterpretation of results. This research characterises the issue of FAB, before presenting a corrective function to remove it. The efficacy of the proposed corrective function and the spatial characteristics of FAB are then evaluated to demonstrate the importance of this issue. We recommend that researchers and practitioners should consider the impact of FAB when undertaking focal analysis and make use of the corrective functions presented here to remove this issue, particularly where geographical weighting is desired.

International Journal of Geographical Information SystemsVol. 39(6)
Utrecht University (NL), University of Manchester (GB), Centre de Géosciences (FR)
Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.