Reflecting on flexibility in the probation system: Learning from Catalonia and England and Wales

The criminological literature affirms that the flexibility of probation officers is a very important aspect and highly valued by the community users' population and, in fact, is an important element that stands out in good-quality supervision in the community. However, flexibility remains an abstract concept and varies according to different jurisdictions. Moreover, there is little literature on what it means in theory and in practice to be flexible, how it is understood by professionals and how it is understood by users. This article reviews the literature on flexibility and discretion by differentiating between two frequently related concepts. It takes the example of Catalonia and England and Wales and the respective research in which the authors have been involved to examine what is meant by flexibility, conceptually and in practice. To do so, they analyse the experiences of both professionals and the user population in both jurisdictions through an intersectional perspective focused mainly on gender. Finally, evidence-based implications are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241305770
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflecting on flexibility in the probation system: Learning from Catalonia and England and Wales

Jane Dominey, Cristina Vasilescu
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Reflecting on flexibility in the probation system: Learning from Catalonia and England and Wales

Jane Dominey, Cristina Vasilescu
article en

Abstract

The criminological literature affirms that the flexibility of probation officers is a very important aspect and highly valued by the community users' population and, in fact, is an important element that stands out in good-quality supervision in the community. However, flexibility remains an abstract concept and varies according to different jurisdictions. Moreover, there is little literature on what it means in theory and in practice to be flexible, how it is understood by professionals and how it is understood by users. This article reviews the literature on flexibility and discretion by differentiating between two frequently related concepts. It takes the example of Catalonia and England and Wales and the respective research in which the authors have been involved to examine what is meant by flexibility, conceptually and in practice. To do so, they analyse the experiences of both professionals and the user population in both jurisdictions through an intersectional perspective focused mainly on gender. Finally, evidence-based implications are presented.

Criminology & Criminal Justice
University of Cambridge (GB), Universitat de Girona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflecting on flexibility in the probation system: Learning from Catalonia and England and Wales — Jane Dominey, Cristina Vasilescu · Criminology & Criminal Justice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS