Solar Potential Assessment for Remote Electrification in Ethiopia: A Comparative Modelling Approach

Understanding the solar potential of remote regions is crucial for addressing energy poverty, promoting economic development, and mitigating the impacts of climate change, especially in underserved areas. However, access to comprehensive localized solar radiation data is severely limited in most remote regions due to lack of measuring devices and nonfunctional meteorological stations. In this research, we leverage spatially sparse dataset comprising records from 54 sites and meteorological data from 21 sites across Ethiopia, covering 13 years to predict the monthly global solar irradiance (GHI) for remote inaccessible areas where historical data is unavailable. Climatic variables, such as relative sunshine duration and temperatures are used for computing GHI using dual models. To estimate monthly GHI for regions lacking historical data, deterministic inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Geo statistic Kriging cross validation and interpolation techniques have been employed. The analysis results indicated that a solar potential varies from July (3.70 to 6.54) kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/day in March, based on Prescott model, while its value varied from 3.65 to 7.26 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/day in similar months based on Allen model. Our findings revealed that IDW approaches provide a better spatial resolution compared to the Kriging technique. Based on the mean per months bases Statistical error model analysis exhibited accurate, reliable, and outstanding performance, showcasing minimal Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 0.15, 0.21, and 0.05, along with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values of 0.29, 0.83, and 0.79 for the Kriging technique applied to sunshine, temperature and NASA respectively. This study's solar radiation predictions offer crucial insights for off-grid design, policy development, and sustainable rural electrification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isaect64333.2024.10799829
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solar Potential Assessment for Remote Electrification in Ethiopia: A Comparative Modelling Approach

A. V. Ramayya, Tefera T. Yetayew, Getachew Biru Worku, Abera Jote Lidate
1 citations
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.13
article

Solar Potential Assessment for Remote Electrification in Ethiopia: A Comparative Modelling Approach

A. V. Ramayya, Tefera T. Yetayew, Getachew Biru Worku, Abera Jote Lidate
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding the solar potential of remote regions is crucial for addressing energy poverty, promoting economic development, and mitigating the impacts of climate change, especially in underserved areas. However, access to comprehensive localized solar radiation data is severely limited in most remote regions due to lack of measuring devices and nonfunctional meteorological stations. In this research, we leverage spatially sparse dataset comprising records from 54 sites and meteorological data from 21 sites across Ethiopia, covering 13 years to predict the monthly global solar irradiance (GHI) for remote inaccessible areas where historical data is unavailable. Climatic variables, such as relative sunshine duration and temperatures are used for computing GHI using dual models. To estimate monthly GHI for regions lacking historical data, deterministic inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Geo statistic Kriging cross validation and interpolation techniques have been employed. The analysis results indicated that a solar potential varies from July (3.70 to 6.54) kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/day in March, based on Prescott model, while its value varied from 3.65 to 7.26 kWh/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>/day in similar months based on Allen model. Our findings revealed that IDW approaches provide a better spatial resolution compared to the Kriging technique. Based on the mean per months bases Statistical error model analysis exhibited accurate, reliable, and outstanding performance, showcasing minimal Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 0.15, 0.21, and 0.05, along with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values of 0.29, 0.83, and 0.79 for the Kriging technique applied to sunshine, temperature and NASA respectively. This study's solar radiation predictions offer crucial insights for off-grid design, policy development, and sustainable rural electrification.

Jimma University (ET), Adama Science and Technology University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.