Optimizing Enterprise Architecture: Strategic Approaches to Managing Enterprise Architecture Debt

As organizations grow and evolve in complexity, the strategic management of Enterprise Architecture (EA) becomes crucial for maintaining alignment between business goals and IT infrastructure. Enterprise Architecture Debt (EAD), a concept analogous to Technical Debt, encompasses both technical systems and business processes, reflecting deviations from an ideal enterprise architecture. This study explores how organizations measure, manage, and mitigate Enterprise Architecture Debt (EAD), as well as the key challenges and strategies involved in this process. Through semi-structured interviews with five EA experts and a thematic analysis of their insights, we investigate current practices and challenges in measuring and managing EAD. Our findings reveal professionals’ keen interest in refining these metrics, highlighting the necessity of adaptable, relevant, and cost-effective strategies in EAD management. This research emphasizes the critical role of tailored metrics in fostering efficient architectural strategies and aligning them with organizational objectives, thereby facilitating improved agility and strategic outcomes in enterprise architecture management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cbi62504.2024.00011
Primary Topic
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Enterprise Architecture: Strategic Approaches to Managing Enterprise Architecture Debt

Simon Hacks, Maja Holmgren, Nikolas Vergara Borquez
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
article

Optimizing Enterprise Architecture: Strategic Approaches to Managing Enterprise Architecture Debt

Simon Hacks, Maja Holmgren, Nikolas Vergara Borquez
article en

Abstract

As organizations grow and evolve in complexity, the strategic management of Enterprise Architecture (EA) becomes crucial for maintaining alignment between business goals and IT infrastructure. Enterprise Architecture Debt (EAD), a concept analogous to Technical Debt, encompasses both technical systems and business processes, reflecting deviations from an ideal enterprise architecture. This study explores how organizations measure, manage, and mitigate Enterprise Architecture Debt (EAD), as well as the key challenges and strategies involved in this process. Through semi-structured interviews with five EA experts and a thematic analysis of their insights, we investigate current practices and challenges in measuring and managing EAD. Our findings reveal professionals’ keen interest in refining these metrics, highlighting the necessity of adaptable, relevant, and cost-effective strategies in EAD management. This research emphasizes the critical role of tailored metrics in fostering efficient architectural strategies and aligning them with organizational objectives, thereby facilitating improved agility and strategic outcomes in enterprise architecture management.

Stockholm University (SE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing Enterprise Architecture: Strategic Approaches to Managing Enterprise Architecture Debt — Simon Hacks, Maja Holmgren, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS